Skip to content

Add a new curated skill: frontend-design, focused on high-craft frontend UI design + production-ready implementation.#36

Closed
214140846 wants to merge 4 commits into
openai:mainfrom
214140846:main
Closed

Add a new curated skill: frontend-design, focused on high-craft frontend UI design + production-ready implementation.#36
214140846 wants to merge 4 commits into
openai:mainfrom
214140846:main

Conversation

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Add a new curated skill: frontend-design, focused on high-craft frontend UI design + production-ready implementation.

Motivation

Frontend outputs can easily drift into generic “template-y” UI. This skill nudges Codex toward an explicit visual thesis (tone + constraints + differentiation) and then executes it with consistent typography, color, spacing, motion, and accessibility basics.

What’s included

  • skills/.curated/frontend-design/SKILL.md — skill metadata + instructions (design thinking → deliverable bar → aesthetics guidelines)
  • skills/.curated/frontend-design/LICENSE.txt — Apache-2.0 license

How to use / Validation

  • Use when prompts involve building or beautifying UI: pages, landing pages, dashboards, React components, or HTML/CSS layouts.
  • Verified: folder structure + SKILL front matter + Markdown rendering/readability.

Notes

  • Documentation-only (no scripts/tools added).
  • No breaking changes.

Checklist

  • [ ✅] I confirm this skill follows the expected layout (SKILL.md + license).
  • [ ✅] I confirm the content is original or appropriately licensed.
  • [ ✅] I confirm no secrets or proprietary data are included.
  • [ ✅] I’m okay with “Allow edits by maintainers”.

@214140846 214140846 requested a review from a team January 5, 2026 14:39
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown


Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.


I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA


1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.
✅ (214140846)[https://github.com/214140846]
@JinChanZis
You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

recheck

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

CLA check still fails with: Branch cla-signatures not found. Could a maintainer please create/unprotect the cla-signatures branch (or adjust CLA Assistant settings) so signatures can be recorded?

@etraut-openai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@214140846, I added the branch. Please give it another try.

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

recheck

1 similar comment
@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

recheck

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@etraut-openai
After commenting recheck, no new CLA workflow was triggered (there’s no new run in Checks, or it shows “awaiting approval”).

Could a maintainer please approve/rerun the CLA Assistant in Actions, and confirm the cla-signatures branch isn’t protected and that GitHub Actions has write access to record signatures?

@etraut-openai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@214140846, I just tested the CLA workflow on a separate PR, and it worked for me. Please give it another try. If we can't get it to work after one more attempt, I can override manually.

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

recheck

@214140846 214140846 closed this Jan 7, 2026
@214140846 214140846 reopened this Jan 7, 2026
@214140846

214140846 commented Jan 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@etraut-openai I reopened the PR and that resolved the issue — thanks a lot, and appreciate it if you could review the PR when you have time.

@mzeng-openai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@214140846 thanks for contributing to the skills! Do you mind moving this under experimental first so that people can thoroughly test it out before exposing to the larger crowd?

github-actions Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2026
@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@214140846

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

recheck

@214140846 214140846 closed this Jan 21, 2026
sohrabafard added a commit to sohrabafard/skills that referenced this pull request May 31, 2026
fa03b41 Update security-scan.yml
1171662 feat(golang-documentation): add writing principles and doc anti-patterns (openai#50)
536439a fix(ci): add --dangerously-run-mcp-servers to snyk-agent-scan and bump setup-uv@v8 (openai#49)
4ac98d0 fix(ci): resolve lint errors and disable broken workflows (openai#48)
26e1d99 fix(skills): correctness fixes from REVIEW.md audit (28 files) (openai#47)
27543ee fix(benchmark): correct prometheus metric names and BenchmarkAlloc sink
e3d59da bump patch versions for skills changed in recent PRs
9b78280 use module-pinned tool commands (openai#38)
2884899 update testing and benchmark guidance (openai#40)
eebcf61 tighten filesystem and crypto guidance (openai#39)
1d4b107 add Go 1.26 modernization notes (openai#41)
7634dd9 fix troubleshooting guidance accuracy (openai#42)
3804525 tighten lifecycle and error guidance (openai#45)
b04d773 Fix lint and GraphQL guidance (openai#43)
bbb56ac Fix stdlib API version guidance (openai#44)
39df9ff fix WaitGroup.Go version guidance (openai#37)
43bafa8 fix: description optimization loop — 16 skills (plugin v1.5.0) (openai#46)
61451c6 ci: add dependabot automerge workflow (openai#36)
6ccf725 docs: add skill architecture diagram to README
2298675 Add fuzz to naming conventions (openai#21)
15d71cd docs: add skill architecture diagram to README

git-subtree-dir: vendor/cc-skills-golang
git-subtree-split: fa03b41b93c84f27b0698830bc8a821ed4847aad
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants