Initializing storage semantics project#3521
Draft
ramavadl wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Comment on lines
+9
to
+28
| ### Goals | ||
|
|
||
| - Storage users can capture infrastructure metrics and attibutes from storage systems with OpenTelemetry and export these to the tools of their choice. | ||
| - Storage telemetry includes appropriate resource metadata that conforms to OpenTelemetry semantic conventions, enabling consistent observability across different storage technologies. | ||
| - Define semantic conventions for key storage entities including: | ||
| - Storage systems (hardware/software platforms providing data storage) | ||
| - Storage clusters (groups of nodes for high availability and scalability) | ||
| - Storage nodes (individual controllers or servers within storage systems) | ||
| - Storage pools (logical aggregation of storage resources) | ||
| - Storage arrays (disk drives with RAID or data protection) | ||
| - Storage drives (physical storage devices: HDD, SSD, NVMe) | ||
| - Storage enclosures (physical chassis housing drives) | ||
| - Storage volumes (logical storage units presented to hosts) | ||
| - Storage snapshots (point-in-time copies of volumes or file systems) | ||
| - Storage volume groups (collections of volumes managed together) | ||
| - Storage file systems (logical structures organizing files on storage) | ||
| - Storage hosts (servers configured to access storage resources) | ||
| - Storage FC ports (Fibre Channel interfaces for connectivity) | ||
| - Storage IP ports (network interfaces for IP-based protocols) | ||
| - Support both block storage and file storage observability use cases. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be great if we could encorporate the hw/system metrics & attributes which apply to storage systems.
Member
|
Regarding EasyCLA check, I will work with the author to solve this. |
Author
|
I have completed EasyCLA compliance process. It should get fixed when the github pipeline runs |
| To be determined | ||
|
|
||
| #### TC support | ||
| The TC is supportive of the storage semantics effort, focusing on: |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you please tell who from the TC is supportive?
6 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposal for Storage Semantic Conventions Project
Created storage.md for new Storage Semantic Conventions project
Define Storage Semantic Conventions project proposal in storage.md