all: fix declarations and types for symbols#65
Merged
Conversation
german77
reviewed
May 8, 2026
german77
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@german77 reviewed 8 files and all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on MonsterDruide1).
Author
|
I should actually check whether the project compiles... we don't have a nice workflow for that here, compared to @german77 Please re-approve. |
german77
reviewed
May 10, 2026
german77
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@german77 reviewed 2 files and all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on MonsterDruide1).
This was referenced May 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
typedefresults in the typedef-ed type appearing in the signature, instead of the name of the newly defined "type".The easiest way to fix that is by creating full structs instead of only aliases, even if they only contain one member then.
This change is