nixd/tools/nixd-attrset-eval: support completion for "builtins"#620
nixd/tools/nixd-attrset-eval: support completion for "builtins"#620inclyc wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
|
@inclyc did you request my review for something specific or more for a general review? |
A specific review for C++ nix IPC: This pull request introduces the ability to query Very appreciated if you can take a look :) |
|
It looks reasonable to me and similar to what the nix repl does for completing. However I would prefer if @roberth would have a look as well. |
|
|
||
| /// \brief Get nix's `builtins` constant | ||
| inline nix::Value &getBuiltins(const nix::EvalState &State) { | ||
| return *State.baseEnv.values[0]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would do add a TODO now that this could use the proper api in the next nix version.
|
Hey! Checking in here. What all needs to be done to get this working? More than happy to get the ball rolling assuming I can be of any help. |
Actually, this PR is related to the technical approach of #625. I’m considering proposing a technical solution that would work well for both #625 and this PR, but I haven’t had the time to write the code recently. If you’re interested, you could explore the connection between the technical approaches of these two PRs and help move this work forward. |
Basic support for option completion on the worker process. This is the premise for doing this in LSP.
Co-authored-by: Jörg Thalheim <Mic92@users.noreply.github.com>
inclyc
force-pushed
the
support-builtins
branch
from
24792c1 to
af12b9c
Compare
|
Rebased. Resolving merge conflicts. |
|
Closed, prefer #677 |
4 participants
Basic support for option completion on the worker process. This is the premise for doing this in LSP.
Link: #507