Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e088b-8d2a-7351-8353-f28fc5d447a3 - #244
Open
rita-aga wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e088b-8d2a-7351-8353-f28fc5d447a3#244rita-aga wants to merge 7 commits into
rita-aga wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
…uting Route Cedar approvals through child channel sessions
Squash merge Paw Patrol dark-factory worker/reporting implementation after green CI and Mac mini worker verification.
Created automatically by paw-codex-worker. WorkerRun: `en-019e05f7-a899-7ea1-a385-6ed6d2a0dbd2` Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod` Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting` Head branch: `codex/paw-github-patrol-b014b4ba` Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-github-patrol-b014b4ba` Task: You are the local Codex implementer for reviewer-requested rework. FactoryCase: WorkCycle: wc-019e05e9-f6d4-7a71-83a8-d015255c48f5 Summary: Risk Patrol: codex-live-github-patrol-proof: production proof after merge 10eb046. Use GitHub tools intelligently and read-only. Inspect open issues, open PRs, checks, reviews, CI/actions, labels, milestones, stale/blocking conversations, duplicates, and anomalies for nerdsane/temperpaw. Do not mutate GitHub or code in this patrol scan. Create findings only when actionable now; set requires_human_approval=true for production, security, policy, deploy, secrets, migrations, user-facing behavior, or anything with uncertain blast radius. Include evidence_scope entries for issues, PRs, checks/reviews, and CI/actions even if no finding is opened for a surface. Original task: You are the local Codex GitHub Patrol agent for TemperPaw paw-patrol. PatrolRun: en-019e05e9-ef59-7a21-9b30-e22bb014b4ba PatrolKind: github_repository WorkCycle: wc-019e05e9-f6d4-7a71-83a8-d015255c48f5 Summary: codex-live-github-patrol-proof: production proof after merge 10eb046. Use GitHub tools intelligently and read-only. Inspect open issues, open PRs, checks, reviews, CI/actions, labels, milestones, stale/blocking conversations, duplicates, and anomalies for nerdsane/temperpaw. Do not mutate GitHub or code in this patrol scan. Create findings only when actionable now; set requires_human_approval=true for production, security, policy, deploy, secrets, migrations, user-facing behavior, or anything with uncertain blast radius. Include evidence_scope entries for issues, PRs, checks/reviews, and CI/actions even if no finding is opened for a surface. Required loop: 1. Work in the assigned git worktree, but do not edit files or mutate GitHub for this patrol run. 2. Use your authenticated GitHub tools to investigate open issues, open pull requests, checks, reviews, CI/actions, labels, milestones, stale/blocking conversations, duplicate reports, and anomalies for nerdsane/temperpaw. 3. Use judgment. Do not turn every old issue or PR into work; create findings only when the evidence is actionable now or needs human/agent attention. 4. Return structured findings and proof data between GITHUB_PATROL_RESULT_JSON_BEGIN and GITHUB_PATROL_RESULT_JSON_END. The paw-codex-worker validates that JSON and reports it to PatrolRun.RecordEvidence; paw-patrol WASM creates Signals, FactoryCases, WorkCycles, ProofPackets, and risk-gated follow-up WorkerRuns. 5. High-risk, production-impacting, policy, secrets, deploy, security, or user-facing fixes must require human approval before implementation. Reviewer feedback requiring changes: Verdict: request_changes Review: GitHub patrol wiring and focused tests are mostly healthy, but the branch regresses human-start approval for sensitive intake, so I cannot approve it. Live/E2E: Read-only GitHub checks inspected open PRs/issues/runs/labels/milestones; PR #229 is merged at `10eb046e`, and CI/Docker on main are green. I did not start the production server. Required loop: 1. Continue in the assigned git worktree and branch, updating the existing PR when one exists. 2. Address the reviewer feedback directly; keep unrelated changes out. 3. Follow red-green TDD for the correction when a test can express it. 4. Run the focused tests and live/E2E checks named by the reviewer when applicable. 5. Produce updated proof in the WorkerRun result. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits. Codex change evidence: ```git-status M crates/temperpaw/tests/paw_patrol_foundation.rs M os-apps/paw-patrol/wasm/patrol_request_router/src/lib.rs M os-apps/paw-patrol/wasm/signal_router/src/lib.rs ``` ```git-diff-stat crates/temperpaw/tests/paw_patrol_foundation.rs | 6 + .../wasm/patrol_request_router/src/lib.rs | 118 ++++++++++++++++++-- os-apps/paw-patrol/wasm/signal_router/src/lib.rs | 121 +++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) ``` After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.
Created automatically by paw-codex-worker. WorkerRun: `en-019e088b-8d2a-7351-8353-f28fc5d447a3` Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod` Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting` Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-4b896bf0` Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-4b896bf0` Task: You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol. WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e088b-830a-79f0-8a20-9d674b896bf0 FactoryCase: en-019e088b-8c48-73c3-b49f-611c1c509e5a WorkCycle: wc-019e088b-8cb7-70e2-9b0c-bddafb1f63fe Summary: paw-operator-signal: Signal from Paw / operator conversation: curation campaign tracking is missing a durable source of truth, and thumbnail ... Request: Signal from Paw / operator conversation: curation campaign tracking is missing a durable source of truth, and thumbnail handling remains the active execution blocker. Context: - Human asked for the full list of ~40 curation queries and current progress. - Current entity state does not expose a clean campaign manifest. - Persisted memory search returned no saved 40-query plan / manifest. - CurationQueries currently only shows repeated failed canary attempts for two directions: 1) ceramic android service kiosk 2) minimal mecha cockpit notation - Session/conversation history likely contains the original forty-something list, but it is not directly discoverable as a durable artifact. Broad session-file scanning timed out; metadata/filter searches did not surface a clean manifest. Known active canary blocker: - Thumbnail artifact handling remains blocked until the existing Patrol work lands: - Decode base64 thumbnail payloads to image bytes before upload. - Wait for File state Ready before synthesis completes. - Validate browser-renderable image bytes. - Only set has_thumbnail=true after file is Ready and image-valid. Operational gap to fix: - Curation campaigns need a durable manifest / batch source of truth. - The manifest should capture the full query list, batch grouping, submission state, generated DesignLanguage IDs, thumbnail/file status, and current blocker/failure reason. - Recovery is needed for the original forty-something query list from recent session history if possible. Requested Paw Patrol work: 1) Recover the original curation query campaign list from recent session history/conversation artifacts, including the forty-something queries Paw intended to run. 2) Deduplicate and normalize the query list. 3) Persist it as a durable artifact, e.g. /curation/40-query-manifest.md or equivalent entity-backed campaign record. 4) Link each query to existing CurationQuery / DesignLanguage records where possible. 5) Mark current status per query: not submitted, failed, draft produced, under review, published, or blocked. 6) Preserve the two known canary failures and thumbnail blocker details in the manifest. 7) Do not restart the full batch until the thumbnail artifact gate has passed. Acceptance criteria: - A durable curation manifest exists and can be cited by path/entity ID. - The manifest includes all recovered queries, not just the two canaries. - Each query has status and linkage fields where known. - Missing/unrecoverable queries are explicitly labeled as unrecovered, not guessed. - Future operator asks like 'what is the full list and how are we doing?' can be answered from the manifest without scanning session history. Required loop: 1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch. 2. First perform agentic risk triage from actual evidence, not keyword matching. If the work is production-impacting, security/policy-sensitive, deploy/secrets/data-migration related, or otherwise needs human approval, do not make risky changes; report the approval needed and the evidence. 3. Follow red-green TDD before implementation when implementation is safe to start. 4. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies. 5. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior. 6. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links. 7. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits. Codex change evidence: ```git-status ?? .proofs/2026-05-08-curation-campaign-manifest.md ?? curation/ ``` ```git-diff-stat (no unstaged diff stat) ``` After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Created automatically by paw-codex-worker.
WorkerRun:
en-019e088b-8d2a-7351-8353-f28fc5d447a3Worker:
mac-mini-codex-prodBase branch:
codex/paw-patrol-worker-reportingHead branch:
codex/paw-patrol-4b896bf0Worktree:
/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-4b896bf0Task:
You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol.
WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e088b-830a-79f0-8a20-9d674b896bf0
FactoryCase: en-019e088b-8c48-73c3-b49f-611c1c509e5a
WorkCycle: wc-019e088b-8cb7-70e2-9b0c-bddafb1f63fe
Summary: paw-operator-signal: Signal from Paw / operator conversation: curation campaign tracking is missing a durable source of truth, and thumbnail ...
Request:
Signal from Paw / operator conversation: curation campaign tracking is missing a durable source of truth, and thumbnail handling remains the active execution blocker.
Context:
Known active canary blocker:
Operational gap to fix:
Requested Paw Patrol work:
Acceptance criteria:
Required loop:
Codex change evidence:
After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.