Polish the public benchmark for portfolio sharing

[nedcut]

What changed

• puts the phase-one result and author identity above the fold
• adds direct links to the findings, tagged evidence release, reproduction guide, and live site
• makes the leaderboard compact by default with an accessible full-telemetry toggle
• reframes visible validation warnings as protocol flags and explains their eligibility meaning
• fixes the GitHub Pages favicon path and adds canonical/Open Graph/Twitter metadata
• increases low-contrast metadata text and fixes narrow-screen navigation/page overflow
• adds regression checks for the employer-facing claim and evidence surfaces

Why

The benchmark and release were technically ready, but the public presentation made cold visitors work too hard to discover the result, author, and reproducibility evidence. The wide default table, stale sharing description, broken favicon path, and mobile overflow also weakened portfolio readiness.

User impact

A recruiter or technical reviewer now sees the result, author, and evidence path immediately. Technical readers keep access to the full telemetry without forcing every visitor through twelve columns.

Validation

• 474 passed
• Ruff format check: 85 files already formatted
• Ruff lint: passed
• web oxlint: passed
• production build with BASE_PATH=/gm-bench/: passed
• rendered desktop and 390px mobile QA passed
• telemetry expansion interaction passed
• all new public links returned HTTP 200
• built favicon resolves to /gm-bench/favicon.svg

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added links to current findings, evidence releases, and reproduction resources.
  • Added optional leaderboard telemetry columns, including latency, fallback rate, failed queries, and token counts.
  • Added canonical, Open Graph, and Twitter metadata for improved sharing and discoverability.

• Improvements

  • Updated footer navigation and attribution details.
  • Improved leaderboard status guidance and accessibility.
  • Refined responsive layouts, typography, table interactions, and mobile presentation.

• Documentation

  • Updated the README with links to the live leaderboard, phase-one findings, and tagged evidence release.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@nedcut, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 50 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 38de5c99-eb04-48b0-a6bc-8103357c2d5d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea884c0 and e81e966.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• .semgrep.yml
• scripts/prepare_semgrep_ruleset.py
• web/index.html

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR refreshes GM-Bench publication links and metadata, adds employer-facing evidence assertions, refactors leaderboard telemetry visibility and formatting, and updates responsive styling for the hero, navigation, tables, and footer.

Changes

Publication and leaderboard refresh

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Publication links and site metadata README.md, web/index.html, web/src/components/Hero.tsx, web/src/components/Footer.tsx, tests/test_publication_claims.py	Adds links to current findings and evidence releases, updates attribution and footer links, adds SEO metadata, and validates expected publication content.
Leaderboard telemetry presentation web/src/components/Leaderboard.tsx, web/src/index.css	Adds a telemetry toggle, moves detailed metrics into conditional columns, updates formatting and status accessibility text, and adds table control/focus styles.
Responsive visual layout web/src/index.css	Updates mobile navigation, hero typography and spacing, horizontal overflow handling, design tokens, and footer wrapping/layout.

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant APILeaderboard
  participant ModelTable
  participant Reviewer
  APILeaderboard->>ModelTable: provide model rows
  Reviewer->>ModelTable: toggle telemetry visibility
  ModelTable-->>Reviewer: render score, cost, status, and optional telemetry columns

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• nedcut/gm-bench#58: Related leaderboard telemetry and failed-query data changes.
• nedcut/gm-bench#72: Related ModelTable rendering and column-layout refactor.

Suggested reviewers: cursoragent

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly reflects the PR’s main goal: polishing the public benchmark presentation for portfolio sharing.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/portfolio-readiness

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[nedcut]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.