refactor: Dispatch IO functions via *Namespace methods - #3793
Merged
Conversation
dangotbanned
requested review from
dangotbanned
and removed request for
dangotbanned
July 21, 2026 11:00
dangotbanned
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2026
dangotbanned
left a comment
dangotbanned
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @FBruzzesi, really appreciate this!
Member
Author
|
Thanks @dangotbanned - addressed all your feedback in 264b5a3 - Update: except that the wrong doc file was committed, so look at 2f26bee 🤦🏼♂️ Looking forward to merge this 🔥 |
7 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Follow-up to the contract discussion in #3753 (#3753 (comment))
read_csv,scan_csv,read_parquetandscan_parquetnow dispatch to same-named methods on the compliant*Namespaceinstead of per-backendif/elifchains infunctions.py.What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Related issues
from_*methods/functions #3753