19.3: reframe A.4 publication as start-now, deadline is a backstop#105
Merged
Conversation
Articles are approved, so publication can start now. Drop the "start by mid-July" framing that implied deferring; the 60-day A.R.S. 10-130 window (2026-08-07) is a backstop, not the plan. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #104. The A.4 wording said "start by mid-July to fit 3 weekly runs," which framed the 60-day publication window as a target to back into. It isn't — CyberCreek's Articles are approved, so publication can start immediately, with the 2026-08-07 A.R.S. § 10-130 deadline as a backstop, not the plan.
Doc-only, one line.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code