Skip to content

Docs cleanup#263

Open
angpt wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs-cleanup
Open

Docs cleanup#263
angpt wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs-cleanup

Conversation

@angpt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@angpt angpt commented Jun 4, 2026

Reorganizing docs:

  1. Added a troubleshooting guide
  2. Cleaned up pre-requisites

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added comprehensive troubleshooting guide covering setup, configuration, and runtime failure issues.
    • Clarified runtime prerequisites and installation instructions based on MCP server package types.
    • Enhanced quick-start guidance with specific requirements for uvx, Node.js, and Docker runtimes.
    • Expanded documentation with guidance on common issues, including cache freshness and CORS configuration.

@angpt angpt requested a review from peteski22 June 4, 2026 18:20
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c9c226f8-0cf7-4707-9b65-b8ca5c2621a1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb2a210 and c1a508e.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • README.md
  • docs/caching.md
  • docs/configuration.md
  • docs/daemon-configuration.md
  • docs/index.md
  • docs/installation.md
  • docs/plugin-configuration.md
  • docs/requirements.md
  • docs/troubleshooting.md
  • docs/tutorial.md
  • mkdocs.yaml

Walkthrough

This pull request adds comprehensive troubleshooting documentation and restructures existing guides to clarify runtime/installation prerequisites for the mcpd daemon. The changes improve user onboarding by explaining which tools are required based on the MCP server runtime types they plan to use (uvx, npx, or Docker).

Changes

Troubleshooting and Prerequisites Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Comprehensive troubleshooting guide
docs/troubleshooting.md
New 218-line guide covering debug logging setup, missing servers/registries, runtime mismatches, missing args/environment values, configuration reload semantics, CORS and API address issues, tool exposure, Docker host integration, plugin validation, and guidance on collecting information when requesting help.
Runtime prerequisites and requirements documentation
README.md, docs/requirements.md, docs/installation.md, docs/index.md
README.md Quick Start prerequisites updated with runtime-specific installation guidance. docs/requirements.md restructured to map server prefixes (uvx::uv, npx:: → Node.js, docker:: → Docker) with optional and development-only tooling tables. docs/installation.md and docs/index.md added "Runtime prerequisites" callouts clarifying that mcpd binary and MCP server runtime installations are separate steps.
Troubleshooting references across documentation
docs/configuration.md, docs/daemon-configuration.md, docs/caching.md, docs/plugin-configuration.md, docs/installation.md
Multiple documentation pages updated with cross-references directing readers to troubleshooting.md for hot reload issues, CORS/API address problems, cache staleness, plugin validation, and Docker server integration scenarios.
Documentation messaging refinement and tutorial clarification
docs/index.md, docs/tutorial.md, mkdocs.yaml
docs/index.md refined capability messaging and added troubleshooting navigation link. docs/tutorial.md added explicit prerequisites note for uv and clarified time server runtime, added npx requirement for inspector tool, and simplified API example commands. mkdocs.yaml navigation updated to expose troubleshooting guide at top level.

Possibly related PRs

  • mozilla-ai/mcpd#235: Updates README setup and installation guidance with Docker/npx/uvx runtime requirements, overlapping directly with prerequisites documentation changes in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • peteski22
  • aittalam
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title "Docs cleanup" is vague and generic, using a non-descriptive term that doesn't convey the specific nature of the changes (adding troubleshooting guide and reorganising prerequisites). Consider using a more descriptive title such as "Add troubleshooting guide and reorganise documentation prerequisites" to clearly communicate the main changes.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs-cleanup

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant