Add Quantum Carpet particle-in-a-box brush#65
Open
Fokiees wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Example
Summary
quantumcarpetbrush based on particle-in-a-box wave-packet evolutionThe brush uses interference between energy eigenstates with their characteristic
n^2phase evolution, producing bright bands, dark canals, and partial revivalstructures along a stroke. It depends only on NumPy at runtime.
Validation
python -m unittest effect.quantumcarpet.test_quantumcarpet -vpython -m effect.quantumcarpet.generate_examplespython -m py_compile effect/quantumcarpet/quantumcarpet.py effect/quantumcarpet/generate_examples.py effect/quantumcarpet/test_quantumcarpet.pyeffect/quantumcarpet/quantumcarpet_requirements.jsonas JSONAI disclosure
I used OpenAI Codex for repository navigation, implementation drafting, test
review, and submission preparation. I reviewed the implementation, inspected
the generated output, and ran the validation commands above locally.
Addresses #50.