Skip to content

docs(readme): catch up with PRs #19–#23#24

Merged
cursor[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/readme-post-19-23-3e24
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

docs(readme): catch up with PRs #19–#23#24
cursor[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/readme-post-19-23-3e24

Conversation

@moonlight-lupin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

The skill table already hinted at HTML + Excel visualise, but the rest of the README still read like a pre-0.6 toolkit. This brings the pitch pages in line with what actually shipped in #19#23 (and the closely related large-file path).

Updates

  • When it shines — large-file streaming; stakeholder one-pager can be HTML or Excel charts
  • Skill table — pptx + vision image extract; analyse playbooks / richer metrics / analysis.json; visualise as HTML↔Excel orchestrator with optional OfficeCLI PNGs; plain-table parity called out
  • Flow diagram — “HTML dashboard / Excel charts”
  • Why teams choose it — theme applies to both artefacts; agent-stable bin/data-toolkit interface
  • Under the hood / Getting started / Trust — streaming, agent runtime, workbook + optional OfficeCLI, updated optional deps and test commands

No code changes.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

cursoragent and others added 2 commits July 18, 2026 15:47
… extras

Bring the README in line with PRs #19#23: pptx + large-file/vision extract,
richer analyse metrics, visualise as HTML-or-Excel orchestrator (optional
OfficeCLI PNGs), agent runtime entry points, and updated deps/tests.

Co-authored-by: moonlight-lupin <moonlight-lupin@users.noreply.github.com>
Call out that white-label themes cover HTML and Excel charts, and point
at bin/data-toolkit as the stable plan entry point.

Co-authored-by: moonlight-lupin <moonlight-lupin@users.noreply.github.com>
@cursor
cursor Bot marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2026 15:50
@cursor
cursor Bot merged commit 33c1fab into main Jul 18, 2026
3 checks passed
@cursor
cursor Bot deleted the cursor/readme-post-19-23-3e24 branch July 18, 2026 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants