Skip to content

MSC4474: Clarify usage of content blocks in Extensible Events#4474

Draft
HarHarLinks wants to merge 6 commits into
matrix-org:mainfrom
nordeck:nic/feat/clarify-extensible-cbs
Draft

MSC4474: Clarify usage of content blocks in Extensible Events#4474
HarHarLinks wants to merge 6 commits into
matrix-org:mainfrom
nordeck:nic/feat/clarify-extensible-cbs

Conversation

@HarHarLinks

@HarHarLinks HarHarLinks commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rendered preview

You can learn more about the project context at https://gitlab.opencode.de/fitko/matrix-g2x.

I am at the time of writing employed by Nordeck (see source branch), Matrix community member, and Member of The Matrix.org Foundation Governing Board. This proposal is written and published with my role as Nordeck employee, contracting as systems architect for FITKO (German government).

Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
@HarHarLinks HarHarLinks marked this pull request as draft May 18, 2026 16:48
Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
@turt2live turt2live changed the title Clarify usage of content blocks in Extensible Events MSC4474: Clarify usage of content blocks in Extensible Events May 19, 2026
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal. Process state. A-Client Server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Recognizing this is a draft, so not leaving a detailed review.

This MSC feels like it'd be addressed at spec writing time rather than needing a dedicated MSC. The concepts introduced by this proposal are already supported by MSC1767.

Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-Client Server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal. Process state.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants