Skip to content

feat(react): people table#1830

Open
xapg6acc wants to merge 1 commit into
mate-academy:masterfrom
xapg6acc:master
Open

feat(react): people table#1830
xapg6acc wants to merge 1 commit into
mate-academy:masterfrom
xapg6acc:master

Conversation

@xapg6acc

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Your solution is approved because it correctly implements all of the critical filtering, sorting, and URL search parameter behaviors required for the advanced people table. Sex, name, and century filters all work together and are fully driven by the URL, including multi‑select centuries and clearing back to “All” [CHECKLIST ITEM #1, #3, #9, #17, #22]. Sorting is implemented on the name, sex, born, and died columns, with the correct three‑step cycle (ascending → descending → off) and proper handling of the sort and order search params [CHECKLIST ITEM #2, #10#14, #24#27]. Navigation within the People page (including person and relatives links, and the main People link in the navbar) preserves search params, so users can share URLs and keep their filter/sort state while exploring the data [CHECKLIST ITEM #4, #18]. The sidebar is only shown after people are successfully loaded, and the name filter correctly uses the search param as the single source of truth and removes it when the input is emptied [CHECKLIST ITEM #5, #7, #19#21]. The only points left are minor refinements, such as making the reset behavior more consistent with your URL helper utilities or tightening TypeScript types for sort fields, but these are non‑blocking and do not affect functionality. Overall, you’ve met the core functional and checklist requirements, and this is solid, well‑structured work—nice job.


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants