feat(test): js_split_integer

[xapg6acc]

No description provided.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Review Summary

I am approving your solution because the splitInteger tests thoroughly cover all the required behaviors from the task description. You correctly verify the core example cases, including [8], [3,3], [4,4,4,5], and [5,5,5,5,6,6], ensuring the function returns exactly numberOfParts elements and matches the expected outputs. The tests also confirm that splits are as equal as possible, that non-equal parts are sorted in ascending order, and that the max–min difference does not exceed 1, even when value < numberOfParts. This aligns well with the checklist items and demonstrates a solid understanding of the required edge cases and main logic. There are no critical functional gaps or blockers, and no argument-validation tests are added, which is consistent with the stated requirements. Overall, this is a clear, robust test suite that should give good confidence in a correct implementation of splitInteger. Keep up this level of thoroughness in future test files as well.

---

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center¹. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

1. Rate AI review example ↩