task#1099
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
I am requesting changes because one explicit requirement example from the task description is not yet covered by the tests, which means the implementation is not fully validated. Specifically, the description states that splitInteger(17, 4) must return [4, 4, 4, 5], but there is no dedicated Jest test for this case in src/splitInteger.test.js (see around the other explicit example tests for 8,1, 6,2, and 32,6).
To fix this, add a new test case such as it('should split 17 into 4 parts as [4, 4, 4, 5]', () => { ... }) that calls splitInteger(17, 4) and asserts the result equals [4, 4, 4, 5]. This will directly satisfy the explicit example requirement [CHECKLIST ITEM #6] and keep the test suite consistent with the rest of the documented examples. Everything else in your tests and implementation looks solid and aligned with the other checklist items, so once this test is added, the solution will be complete. Keep the clear naming style you already use for the other tests to maintain readability.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| test('should sort parts ascending if they are not equal', () => { | ||
| const result = splitInteger(32, 6); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(result).toEqual([5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6]); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The task description explicitly lists splitInteger(17, 4) === [4, 4, 4, 5] as an example, but there is no corresponding test; add a dedicated test case for this input/output pair to fully meet the requirements.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your solution is approved because the tests thoroughly exercise the required behavior of splitInteger and match all the examples from the task description. You correctly verify that the function returns exactly numberOfParts integers, that the max–min difference is at most 1, and that the results are sorted ascending. The explicit cases splitInteger(8, 1), splitInteger(6, 2), splitInteger(17, 4), and splitInteger(32, 6) are all covered with clear expect(...).toEqual(...) assertions, satisfying the checklist requirements, including [CHECKLIST ITEM #6]. You also added a useful test for the value < numberOfParts scenario, which checks that zeros are handled properly and that the array length is still correct. There are no critical or blocking issues in the test file, and it aligns well with the intended functionality.
Nice work making the tests focused, readable, and directly tied to the requirements—this is exactly what you want in a small unit test suite.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.