Experiment scripts for Biodex and Reranking#219
Merged
Conversation
StanChan03
changed the title
StanChan03
changed the title
liana313
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2026
…/) (#261) ## Problem After #219 merged, the repo had **two** benchmark directories: - `benchmark/` (singular, new in #219) — `biodex`, `reranking` - `benchmarks/` (plural, pre-existing) — `failure_mode_discovery`, `llm_as_judge`, `rag_pubmedqa` ## Fix Move the two new suites into the pre-existing `benchmarks/`: - `benchmark/biodex` → `benchmarks/biodex` - `benchmark/reranking` → `benchmarks/reranking` `benchmark/` is removed. All 10 files move as git renames (history preserved). ## Safety - No subdirectory name collisions between the two folders. - No code or docs reference the singular `benchmark/` path. - The biodex/reranking scripts use sibling imports (e.g. `from metrics import ...`) that resolve within their own folder, unaffected by the parent move. - `benchmarks/main.py` only registers its existing subcommands; the moved suites are run standalone per their READMEs. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Merged
liana313
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2026
Release **v1.2.2**. Bumps `pyproject.toml` 1.2.1 → 1.2.2 and regenerates `uv.lock` to match (so the locked-constraints CI step stays green). Notable changes shipping in this release since 1.2.1: - **#260** — gpt-5 / reasoning-model accuracy fix: model-aware `max_tokens` default + truncation warning (closes #255) - **#262** — fix flaky `test_pairwise_judge` - **#261** — consolidate duplicate benchmark directories - **#219** — Biodex + reranking benchmark suites (resolves #227) On merge I'll tag `v1.2.2` off `main`, which triggers `publish.yml` to build and publish to PyPI. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
README.mdandexamplesfor new features.PLEASE FILL IN THE PR DESCRIPTION HERE ENSURING ALL CHECKLIST ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED.
Purpose
Includes new directory
benchmarkswith scripts used in biodex and reranking experiments in the LOTUS paper.Test Plan
Run scripts and compare results with results in paper
Test Results
N/A
(Optional) Documentation Update
Type of Change
Checklist
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ https://github.com/lotus-data/lotus/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
anything written below this line will be removed by GitHub Actions