Skip to content

[PW_SID:1128570] riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing#2296

Open
linux-riscv-bot wants to merge 2 commits into
workflow__riscv__fixesfrom
pw1128570
Open

[PW_SID:1128570] riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing#2296
linux-riscv-bot wants to merge 2 commits into
workflow__riscv__fixesfrom
pw1128570

Conversation

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR for series 1128570 applied to workflow__riscv__fixes

Name: riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing
URL: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=1128570
Version: 1

Linux RISC-V bot and others added 2 commits July 15, 2026 17:25
RISC-V randconfig can enable NUMA balancing while selecting
SPARSEMEM_EXTREME without SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. In that layout, the
section and node fields can consume enough page flag bits that
LAST_CPUPID cannot fit in page->flags.

The generic MM code then stores last_cpupid in struct page and emits
the "Unfortunate NUMA and NUMA Balancing config" warning from
mm/memory.c.

NUMA balancing needs LAST_CPUPID storage, but this fallback grows
struct page for a configuration that randconfig can select
accidentally. Keep NUMA support available, but advertise RISC-V NUMA
balancing support only when SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is enabled, where the
page flag layout leaves room for LAST_CPUPID.

This was originally seen with a RISC-V randconfig generated from
KCONFIG_SEED=550012.

Signed-off-by: Jia Wang <wangjia@ultrarisc.com>
Signed-off-by: Linux RISC-V bot <linux.riscv.bot@gmail.com>
@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
build-rv32-defconfig
Desc: Builds riscv32 defconfig
Duration: 143.11 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
build-rv64-clang-allmodconfig
Desc: Builds riscv64 allmodconfig with Clang, and checks for errors and added warnings
Duration: 1745.05 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
build-rv64-gcc-allmodconfig
Desc: Builds riscv64 allmodconfig with GCC, and checks for errors and added warnings
Duration: 1423.09 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
build-rv64-nommu-k210-defconfig
Desc: Builds riscv64 defconfig with NOMMU for K210
Duration: 26.49 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
build-rv64-nommu-k210-virt
Desc: Builds riscv64 defconfig with NOMMU for the virt platform
Duration: 28.05 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
checkpatch
Desc: Runs checkpatch.pl on the patch
Duration: 0.73 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
dtb-warn-rv64
Desc: Checks for Device Tree warnings/errors
Duration: 88.23 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
header-inline
Desc: Detects static functions without inline keyword in header files
Duration: 0.26 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
kdoc
Desc: Detects for kdoc errors
Duration: 0.91 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
module-param
Desc: Detect module_param changes
Duration: 0.27 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
verify-fixes
Desc: Verifies that the Fixes: tags exist
Duration: 0.25 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Patch 1: "riscv: require vmemmap for NUMA balancing"
verify-signedoff
Desc: Verifies that Signed-off-by: tags are correct
Duration: 0.33 seconds
Result: PASS

@linux-riscv-bot
linux-riscv-bot force-pushed the workflow__riscv__fixes branch from 8ca72ef to 60e0882 Compare July 19, 2026 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants