Skip to content

added new test case and imporved type safety#4

Merged
squeakycheese75 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/expaning-test-cases
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

added new test case and imporved type safety#4
squeakycheese75 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/expaning-test-cases

Conversation

@squeakycheese75

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@squeakycheese75
squeakycheese75 merged commit 440b728 into main Apr 1, 2026
3 checks passed
@squeakycheese75
squeakycheese75 deleted the feature/expaning-test-cases branch April 1, 2026 15:37

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c13b4c4669

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +32 to +34
opts, err := entities.DecodeDatasetOptions[entities.CSVDatasetOptions](
params.DatasetContext.DatasetOptions,
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Preserve CSV option compatibility when decoding

Switching to DecodeDatasetOptions here drops the key-normalization behavior that ConvertMapToCSVPluginOptions previously provided, so common YAML-style keys like has_headers, skip_lines, or dedupe_key are no longer mapped into CSVDatasetOptions and are silently ignored. In practice this can make header rows get ingested as data (or skip settings not apply), producing incorrect CSV results for existing plans that still use those keys.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant