Skip to content

[cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35] fix: replace RemoveNodeInfo with tainted ghost node in scale-down simulation#9553

Open
k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 7 commits intokubernetes:cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35from
k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-9288-to-cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35
Open

[cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35] fix: replace RemoveNodeInfo with tainted ghost node in scale-down simulation#9553
k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 7 commits intokubernetes:cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35from
k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-9288-to-cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35

Conversation

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9288

/assign jackfrancis

Pods with hard TopologySpreadConstraints using the default nodeTaintsPolicy will no longer cause scale-down/scale-up oscillation. The scale-down simulation now faithfully models the drain taint, matching real scheduler behavior. Pods using nodeTaintsPolicy: Honor are unaffected and continue to scale down correctly.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 25, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If SIG Autoscaling contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/cluster-autoscaler Issues or PRs related to the Cluster Autoscaler component label Apr 25, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bigdarkclown for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/needs-area Indicates that a PR should not merge because it lacks an area label. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/needs-area Indicates that a PR should not merge because it lacks an area label. labels Apr 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/cluster-autoscaler Issues or PRs related to the Cluster Autoscaler component cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants