ai writing 2

[keithrozario]

• ai slop 01
• ai slop 02
• Update keithrozario_blog/content/posts/i-dont-read-ai-slop.md
• Update keithrozario_blog/content/posts/i-dont-read-ai-slop.md
• Update keithrozario_blog/content/posts/i-dont-read-ai-slop.md
• Update keithrozario_blog/content/posts/i-dont-read-ai-slop.md
• Update keithrozario_blog/content/posts/i-dont-read-ai-slop.md
• ai slop reviewed
• Update review-pr workflow to only trigger on opened or reopened events

[github-actions]

Gemini Automated Review

[github-actions]

Hyphenated 'LLM-generated' as it is a compound modifier preceding the noun 'email'.

Suggested change

	Last week, I received my first LLM generated email response.
	Last week, I received my first LLM-generated email response.

[github-actions]

Hyphenated 'LLM-generated' for consistency and capitalized 'Markdown' as it is a proper noun.

Suggested change

I cannot know for sure it was LLM generated, but there were hints in the prose, content and timing. A large portion of the email was written in markdown -- which is something no human does in an email, and then there was the "You're absolutely right!! ... " response we've all seen in our chats. Finally, it was also filled with a general level of 'excitement' most humans never have, and the entire email lacked a 'soul'.

I cannot know for sure it was LLM-generated, but there were hints in the prose, content and timing. A large portion of the email was written in Markdown -- which is something no human does in an email, and then there was the "You're absolutely right!! ... " response we've all seen in our chats. Finally, it was also filled with a general level of 'excitement' most humans never have, and the entire email lacked a 'soul'.

[github-actions]

Changed 'pull-request' to 'pull request' (noun form) and added a comma after 'effort' to close the parenthetical phrase.

Suggested change

	If you abdicate this to an LLM, you've stopped thinking, and your 'content' does not deserve anyone's time. With code this is even more pronounced. A pull-request, even a badly written one, if created by a human, is deserving of at least a review -- but a pull-request written automatically by AI in seconds, with minimal effort is deserving of nothing!
	If you abdicate this to an LLM, you've stopped thinking, and your 'content' does not deserve anyone's time. With code this is even more pronounced. A pull request, even a badly written one, if created by a human, is deserving of at least a review -- but a pull request written automatically by AI in seconds, with minimal effort, is deserving of nothing!

[github-actions]

Changed 'slide-deck' to 'slide deck' (noun form).

Suggested change

	Amazon's writing culture was a remarkable thing, a culture that is now being eaten alive by GenAI slop (apparently!). Writing is a wonderful thing; you can bluff your way through a slide-deck or a verbal presentation, but it's impossible to bluff your way through a written 6-page document.
	Amazon's writing culture was a remarkable thing, a culture that is now being eaten alive by GenAI slop (apparently!). Writing is a wonderful thing; you can bluff your way through a slide deck or a verbal presentation, but it's impossible to bluff your way through a written 6-page document.