Skip to content

[Gecko Bug 1429388] Use classic pytest output style for WPT. r=davehunt,jgraham#122

Open
jgraham wants to merge 22 commits into
masterfrom
gecko/sync/upstream/open/1429388/1
Open

[Gecko Bug 1429388] Use classic pytest output style for WPT. r=davehunt,jgraham#122
jgraham wants to merge 22 commits into
masterfrom
gecko/sync/upstream/open/1429388/1

Conversation

@jgraham

@jgraham jgraham commented Jan 17, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The upstream upgrade of pytest came with a new test progress
percentage feature that introduced a lot of unnecessary log output
in WPT wdspec tests.

This adds a pytest flag that reverts it to use the "classic" output
style, which does not have a test progress bar.
bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla-dev.allizom.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1429388
gecko-commit: 4f065bc82a465371aaa8b6dc0de9514cf6e859c8
gecko-integration-branch: central
gecko-reviewers: davehunt, jgraham

jgraham and others added 22 commits January 16, 2018 22:04
bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla-dev.allizom.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430622
gecko-commit: 2ea467872d7fcd3dbb31fcf881e4147b6dd6bebe
gecko-integration-branch: autoland
gecko-reviewers: xidorn, mats
bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla-dev.allizom.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1303025
gecko-commit: 62f5c4a3682381134b607d359824b7605ec15156
gecko-integration-branch: autoland
gecko-reviewers: bkelly
The upstream upgrade of pytest came with a new test progress
percentage feature that introduced a lot of unnecessary log output
in WPT wdspec tests.

This adds a pytest flag that reverts it to use the "classic" output
style, which does not have a test progress bar.
bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla-dev.allizom.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1429388
gecko-commit: 4f065bc82a465371aaa8b6dc0de9514cf6e859c8
gecko-integration-branch: central
gecko-reviewers: davehunt, jgraham
jgraham pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2018
dd57b9f0db chore(package): update dev deps
7f99dea07c chore(package): bump version number to 10.2.1
c357d4cb01 Add bug link and remove unnecessary quote tests
cd1f7a95ba Add a comment about not using for (const ...)
39a957721c Tokenise a solitary '/' correctly
4efd252f5e Use "let" instead of "var" in for statement
f940514f36 Add count() function. Use idiomatic string methods.
affdfbdc2b Optimise tokenisation and whitespace skipping
ba00d5d9ec refactor: small syntax changes (#137)
d5c4fbfdfc chore(CHANGELOG): regenerate
3d009b634a chore(CHANGELOG): regenerate
23bb9bb290 chore(CHANGELOG): regenerate
6db306af62 chore(package): bump version number to 10.2.0
ac7ef088f3 fix: solve conflicts from typing union types
f422f2a6f5 feat: type on union types (#135)
bde0553b49 feat: add const-type for idlTypes (#132)
c03cd7e8f3 feat: add dictionary/typedef-type (#133)
6eb1e7f4db feat: add argument/return type (#134)
d2cfdfd901 feat: add type: attribute-type on idlTypes (#131)
1e29dcb71b Auto acquisition for parser result changes (#130)
154eabfbb1 chore(package): update mocha, expect, bump version
36932debd7 Let error messages include the current definition name (#129)
664f63b61e chore(package-lock): regenerate
536157bffa chore(package): bump version number to 10.0.0
d5b88179df chore(pacakge): upgrade expect dep
0c103b356e Maintain writer.js (#122)
e2d4467ea1 remove typeExtAttrs from docs
0226b76587 remove iterator documentation (#123)
e36ae6bf70 BREAKING CHANGE: remove deprecated iterator operation (#121)
8e73c4ff4c use for-of on tests
c56a921d9b docs(README): iterables ildType is always array
3f39cb152e chore(CHANGELOG): regenerate
ae0060f859 chore(package): bump version number to 9.0.0
24669ed245 BREAKING CHANGE: consistent array type for iterable.idlType (#117)
f89b5803c7 Update package-lock.json
f581ac63c3 Add myself to contributors in package.json
420ac52ac5 Revert "chore: drop Node 6 support (#102)"
1c031ed86e chore(CHANGELOG): regenerate

git-subtree-dir: resources/webidl2
git-subtree-split: dd57b9f0db1adbb5712f9fdd6a4e38533ff4ba4b
@jgraham jgraham force-pushed the master branch 5 times, most recently from d955567 to c33d9e2 Compare May 3, 2018 17:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants