Issue #109: Add HTTP HEAD support#124
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughConnectionHandler now dispatches HEAD requests to a new StaticFileHandler.sendHeadRequest(...); other methods continue to use sendGetRequest(...). sendHeadRequest builds headers (including Content-Length) but writes an empty body per HTTP HEAD semantics. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
actor Client
participant ConnectionHandler
participant StaticFileHandler
Client->>ConnectionHandler: HTTP HEAD /file.txt
ConnectionHandler->>ConnectionHandler: Evaluate request.getMethod()
alt Method is HEAD
ConnectionHandler->>StaticFileHandler: sendHeadRequest(outputStream, uri)
StaticFileHandler->>StaticFileHandler: handleGetRequest(uri)
StaticFileHandler->>StaticFileHandler: Build response headers (incl. Content-Length)
StaticFileHandler-->>Client: Send headers only (empty body)
else Method is GET (or other)
ConnectionHandler->>StaticFileHandler: sendGetRequest(outputStream, uri)
StaticFileHandler->>StaticFileHandler: handleGetRequest(uri)
StaticFileHandler->>StaticFileHandler: Build headers + body
StaticFileHandler-->>Client: Send headers + file content
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
⚔️ Resolve merge conflicts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@src/main/java/org/example/StaticFileHandler.java`:
- Around line 69-78: sendHeadRequest currently calls handleGetRequest(uri) then
sets an empty body, which makes HttpResponseBuilder compute Content-Length: 0;
instead, after handleGetRequest(uri) use the computed fileBytes length to set
the Content-Length header on the HttpResponseBuilder before suppressing the body
(e.g., response.setHeader("Content-Length", String.valueOf(fileBytes.length)) or
response.setContentLength(fileBytes.length) if available), then
setStatusCode(statusCode), setContentTypeFromFilename(uri), setBody(new byte[0])
and write the response so the HEAD response advertises the same Content-Length a
GET would return.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 0c570eff-f22f-459f-9997-b391714ab6f0
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/java/org/example/ConnectionHandler.javasrc/main/java/org/example/StaticFileHandler.java
This PR adds support for the HTTP HEAD method. HEAD requests now return the same status code and headers as GET requests, but without a response body. Existing GET functionality remains unchanged, and error responses follow the same behavior.
Summary by CodeRabbit