Skip to content

Qualities draft#101

Open
ThHanke wants to merge 201 commits into
masterfrom
qualities_draft
Open

Qualities draft#101
ThHanke wants to merge 201 commits into
masterfrom
qualities_draft

Conversation

@ThHanke

@ThHanke ThHanke commented Mar 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

draft of qualities ontology from Materials Working Group, request to be merged as provisional new ontology module

Hanke and others added 30 commits January 8, 2024 09:37
Added the readme file prepared by Stephen Granite, Milos Drobnjakovic and the BD1 modularization WG.
… that are indeed capabilities, readded the to be discussed items
arsarkar and others added 20 commits February 17, 2026 15:19
imported the release version of the certification module and deleted the properties/classes that are not from it
…olicy

made labels uncapitalized; removed any leading articles and removed any trailing punctuation marks
… moved the brackets in the attesting process to the explanatory note
- Merged 297 commits from master (major IOF namespace restructuring)
- Resolved conflicts in AboutIOFDev.rdf, MetadataIOF.rdf, catalog-v001.xml
- AboutIOFDev.rdf: updated iof-av namespace, removed PPS/PSS/Cert, added qualities import
- MetadataIOF.rdf: added qualities import + hasPart, updated versionIRI/copyright
- catalog-v001.xml: merged master entries, added all qualities/* module URIs
- Metadataqualities.rdf: added iof-av:maturity Provisional annotation

All 1186 quality terms pass annotation checker with 0 issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ThHanke

ThHanke commented Mar 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I updated the whole qualities library to the new iof structure and made mayor improvents on the term annotations to fulfill the specs needed. the hygiene test runs without errors on my local machine. i dont know why its stuck here. I think it might be good to get some additional eyes on this^^

@wsobel

wsobel commented Mar 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi Thomas, I'll take a look. You may also want to merge in the 202601 PR branch as well to see if that fixes any of the issues.

@wsobel

wsobel commented Mar 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'll test on my side as well and see what may be the problem.

@MilosDrobnjakovic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Happy to review this PR and I think we should establish collaboration between our groups ASAP @jlloganiii. As an FYI i am currently in the CET time zone so I am available to meet in different times to talk about this

@wsobel

wsobel commented Mar 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I am also CET, so I'd be happy to join in during our "work" day.

@ThHanke

ThHanke commented Mar 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

did the merge and everything looks correct

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants