fix(web_to_markdown): honor the --remove-links option#89
fix(web_to_markdown): honor the --remove-links option#89idvorkin-ai-tools wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
ignore_links was hardcoded to True, so links were always stripped and the option (default False) did nothing. Note this changes default behavior: links are now kept unless --remove-links is passed, matching the documented semantics. Part of idvorkin#86 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 59 minutes and 47 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
1 participant
Part of #86.
ignore_linkswas hardcoded toTrue, so links were always stripped and the--remove-linksoption (defaultFalse) did nothing.--remove-linksto get the old always-strip behavior.CR (subagent code-reviewer): approve — audited the whole repo for callers (shell configs, scripts, aliases, nvim); the only references are in historical chat logs, so nothing automated relies on the old default. Only human muscle memory is affected.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code