Skip to content

intel_gpu: update README with Xe drivers#626

Open
dbarry9 wants to merge 1 commit into
icl-utk-edu:masterfrom
dbarry9:2026.06.26__intel_gpu-readme
Open

intel_gpu: update README with Xe drivers#626
dbarry9 wants to merge 1 commit into
icl-utk-edu:masterfrom
dbarry9:2026.06.26__intel_gpu-readme

Conversation

@dbarry9

@dbarry9 dbarry9 commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request Description

Update the README to include the paranoid flag for the Xe drivers in addition to the i915 drivers.

Reference: Intel Documentation

Author Checklist

  • Description
    Why this PR exists. Reference all relevant information, including background, issues, test failures, etc
  • Commits
    Commits are self contained and only do one thing
    Commits have a header of the form: module: short description
    Commits have a body (whenever relevant) containing a detailed description of the addressed problem and its solution
  • Tests
    The PR needs to pass all the tests

Update the README to include the paranoid flag for the Xe drivers in
addition to the i915 drivers.
@dbarry9 dbarry9 requested a review from Treece-Burgess June 26, 2026 16:08
@dbarry9 dbarry9 added component-intel_gpu PRs and Issues related to the intel_gpu component status-ready-for-review PR is ready to be reviewed labels Jun 26, 2026
* [Intel(R) Metrics Discovery Application Programming Interface (libigdmd.so)](https://github.com/intel/metrics-discovery)
* [Intel(R) Metrics Library Application Programming Interface (libigdml.so)](https://github.com/intel/metrics-library)
* /proc/sys/dev/i915/perf_stream_paranoid is set to `0`
* `/proc/sys/dev/i915/perf_stream_paranoid` or `/proc/sys/dev/xe/observation_paranoid` is set to `0`

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am able to verify the /proc/sys/dev/i915/perf_stream_paranoid path exists; however, I am unable to do the same for /proc/sys/dev/xe/observation_paranoid does. Do you know of a machine we have access to that this can be verified?

Irrespective of the above, would following Intel's wording be better? In their documentation they state:

  • Set dev.i915.perf_stream_paranoid to 0.

Then the same could be said for Xe driver:

  • Set dev.xe.observation_paranoid to 0.

So all in all the README change would be:

  • If the i915 driver is in use set dev.i915.perf_stream_paranoid to 0, alternatively if the Xe driver is in use set dev.xe.observation_paranoid to 0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

component-intel_gpu PRs and Issues related to the intel_gpu component status-ready-for-review PR is ready to be reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants