Codex-generated pull request#12
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideReplaces the placeholder README with a detailed Markdown description of an AoT XML-based prompt-enhancer framework, including a production-ready XML prompt template for legacy-code refactoring and testability, plus collaboration commitments for future prompt work. Sequence diagram for applying the XML prompt to a legacy-code repositorysequenceDiagram
actor PromptAuthor
participant PromptFramework
participant LLM
participant Repository
PromptAuthor->>PromptFramework: Provide user_original_prompt
PromptFramework->>PromptFramework: Build XML prompt
PromptFramework-->>PromptAuthor: XML prompt template
PromptAuthor->>LLM: Submit XML prompt
LLM->>Repository: Access target_repository_url
Repository-->>LLM: Source code and structure
LLM->>LLM: Analyze target_function_names
LLM->>LLM: Identify seams, invariants, behavior contracts
LLM-->>PromptAuthor: SectionA Refactor Plan
LLM-->>PromptAuthor: SectionB Test Execution & Usage Guide
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Summary of ChangesHello @ib-bsb-br, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request formalizes the adoption of the AoT Prompt-Enhancer framework, a structured, XML-centric approach to prompt engineering. It includes a detailed example of how this framework can be applied to a complex task like legacy code refactoring, ensuring clarity, consistency, and testability in prompt design. The changes aim to standardize prompt development and facilitate collaborative efforts. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- The new README content describes an internal AoT prompt-engineering framework rather than this repository’s purpose, usage, or architecture; consider replacing it with project-specific information and moving this framework description to a separate internal document if needed.
- Embedding a large XML prompt template directly in the README may be confusing for external users and makes the top-level documentation harder to scan; consider summarizing the approach and linking to a dedicated prompt/spec file instead.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The new README content describes an internal AoT prompt-engineering framework rather than this repository’s purpose, usage, or architecture; consider replacing it with project-specific information and moving this framework description to a separate internal document if needed.
- Embedding a large XML prompt template directly in the README may be confusing for external users and makes the top-level documentation harder to scan; consider summarizing the approach and linking to a dedicated prompt/spec file instead.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the README.md file, replacing a placeholder with a comprehensive document on the 'AoT Prompt-Enhancer Framework'. The new content includes a detailed XML-based prompt for legacy code refactoring. The document is well-structured, but I have identified an opportunity to improve the clarity and XML-idiomaticity of list representation within the provided examples. My suggestions aim to make the XML data structure more explicit and robust.
| <example> | ||
| <input_data> | ||
| <target_repository_url>https://github.com/example-org/example-app</target_repository_url> | ||
| <target_function_names>["ProcessOrder", "ComputeTax"]</target_function_names> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better clarity and adherence to XML best practices, it's recommended to represent lists using nested elements rather than a JSON-like string. This makes the data structure explicit and easier to parse without relying on string manipulation of a specific format.
| <target_function_names>["ProcessOrder", "ComputeTax"]</target_function_names> | |
| <target_function_names> | |
| <function>ProcessOrder</function> | |
| <function>ComputeTax</function> | |
| </target_function_names> |
| <example> | ||
| <input_data> | ||
| <target_repository_url>https://github.com/example-org/legacy-service</target_repository_url> | ||
| <target_function_names>["HandleRequest"]</target_function_names> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better clarity and adherence to XML best practices, it's recommended to represent lists using nested elements rather than a JSON-like string. This makes the data structure explicit and easier to parse without relying on string manipulation of a specific format.
| <target_function_names>["HandleRequest"]</target_function_names> | |
| <target_function_names> | |
| <function>HandleRequest</function> | |
| </target_function_names> |
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
1 participant
Codex generated this pull request, but encountered an unexpected error after generation. This is a placeholder PR message.
Codex Task
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation:
Summary by cubic
Updates the README with a structured critique and a corrected, unified AoT prompt spec for legacy-code refactoring and testability. It replaces duplicated frameworks, clarifies inputs, and makes the workflow executable and consistent.
Written for commit 4f89aa3. Summary will update on new commits.