Skip to content

Add Lumin evidence workflow guardrails#7

Merged
hun99999 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/lumin-evidence-workflow
Jun 8, 2026
Merged

Add Lumin evidence workflow guardrails#7
hun99999 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/lumin-evidence-workflow

Conversation

@hun99999

@hun99999 hun99999 commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • add an evidence-backed Lumin workflow to the setup playbook and vibe-coding guide
  • add a structural evidence index for local.md / Obsidian / private wiki usage
  • teach apply/start prompts to require scan range, invocation-specific pre-write advisory, and post-write delta review
  • report existing .audit artifacts in optional tool inventory without installing or writing anything
  • add docs-contract tests for Lumin evidence, canon source limits, and no overclaimed machine outputs

Lumin mapping

  • structural claims require machine or direct file evidence
  • absence claims require scan range
  • pre-write intent tracks names, shapes, files, dependencies, plannedTypeEscapes
  • post-write machine evidence is scoped to type escapes, unexpected files, scan/confidence changes
  • duplicate helpers, dependency drift, API drift, and re-export drift stay manual review claims
  • Lumin canon sources are limited to type ownership, helper registry, topology, naming
  • broader boundary/API/dependency/re-export facts belong in living audit or project docs

Verification

  • python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p 'test_*.py' (101 tests)
  • python3 scripts/audit_agent_stack.py
  • python3 scripts/check_private_paths.py
  • git diff --check

Review

  • Subagent reviewer found two medium issues around Lumin overclaims and weak tests.
  • Follow-up fixes were applied and the reviewer re-checked those findings with no remaining issues.

@hun99999
hun99999 merged commit db2a474 into main Jun 8, 2026
1 check passed
@hun99999
hun99999 deleted the codex/lumin-evidence-workflow branch June 8, 2026 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant