Skip to content

Add Accessory Status sensor to Lyric integration - #177064

Draft
clutch2sft wants to merge 1 commit into
home-assistant:devfrom
clutch2sft:sensor-accessory-status
Draft

Add Accessory Status sensor to Lyric integration#177064
clutch2sft wants to merge 1 commit into
home-assistant:devfrom
clutch2sft:sensor-accessory-status

Conversation

@clutch2sft

@clutch2sft clutch2sft commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Resideo's priority endpoint reports a per-accessory status (e.g. "Ok") for paired room sensor accessories, which was parsed but never surfaced. Adds it as a diagnostic sensor so a failing/offline room sensor is visible instead of just its temperature/humidity readings silently going stale.

Proposed change

Resideo's priority endpoint reports a per-accessory status (e.g. "Ok") for
paired room sensor accessories, which was parsed but never surfaced. Adds it as a
diagnostic sensor so a failing/offline room sensor is visible instead of just its
temperature/humidity readings silently going stale.

Dependency note: this needs #177022 (coordinator actually fetching room data) to
populate at all, but the underlying accessory.status field already reads the
correct JSON key in the currently-released aiolyric — no library fix required.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

Checklist

  • I understand the code I am submitting and can explain how it works.
  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.
  • Any generated code has been carefully reviewed for correctness and compliance with project standards.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies a diff between library versions and ideally a link to the changelog/release notes is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

Resideo's priority endpoint reports a per-accessory status (e.g.
"Ok") for paired room sensor accessories, which was parsed but never
surfaced. Adds it as a diagnostic sensor so a failing/offline room
sensor is visible instead of just its temperature/humidity readings
silently going stale.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 22, 2026 09:44
@home-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hey there @timmo001, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (lyric) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of lyric can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant mark-draft Mark the pull request as draft.
  • @home-assistant ready-for-review Remove the draft status from the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign lyric Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant update-branch Update the pull request branch with the base branch.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component, problem in config, problem in device, feature-request) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component, problem in config, problem in device, feature-request) on the pull request.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a diagnostic sensor exposing Honeywell Lyric room-accessory status.

Changes:

  • Adds the accessory status sensor definition.
  • Adds its translated entity name.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
sensor.py Defines the diagnostic accessory status sensor.
strings.json Adds the sensor’s display name.

Comment on lines +136 to +140
LyricSensorAccessoryEntityDescription(
key="accessory_status",
translation_key="accessory_status",
entity_category=EntityCategory.DIAGNOSTIC,
value_fn=lambda _, accessory: accessory.status,
Comment on lines +136 to +140
LyricSensorAccessoryEntityDescription(
key="accessory_status",
translation_key="accessory_status",
entity_category=EntityCategory.DIAGNOSTIC,
value_fn=lambda _, accessory: accessory.status,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io
Link to documentation pull request: home-assistant/home-assistant.io#46986

Comment on lines +49 to +50
"accessory_status": {
"name": "Accessory status"
),
LyricSensorAccessoryEntityDescription(
key="accessory_status",
translation_key="accessory_status",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What are the possible options? If it's a finite list, we should make this an enum device class and return the possible options so we can make a better experience

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good question — I actually went and checked. Resideo's own API schema for this endpoint doesn't document a status field on accessories at all (only id, type, excludeTemp, excludeMotion, temperature are documented; status shows up in practice but isn't in their spec). The only value I've ever observed, across my own live capture and aiolyric's test fixtures, is "Ok" — I have no second data point.

Given that, I'd rather not enum-ify it yet: if I lock in options=["Ok"] and a sensor actually goes offline/errors (exactly the failure mode this diagnostic sensor exists to surface), HA would treat that unlisted value as invalid instead of showing it — which defeats the point. Happy to switch to SensorDeviceClass.ENUM the moment we have real evidence of the full value set, but I don't want to guess it into an incomplete enum right now.

@home-assistant
home-assistant Bot marked this pull request as draft July 26, 2026 19:17
@home-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants