DMP-5586 Add is_data_anonymised To 3 APIs#3334
Open
cgi-jhjsimpson wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
cgi-jhjsimpson
requested review from
karen-hedges,
npv0 and
stephenokeefe
and removed request for
a team
cgi-jhjsimpson
changed the title
hmcts-jenkins-cnp
Bot
added
ns:darts-modernisation
prd:darts
rel:darts-api-pr-3334
labels
cgi-jhjsimpson
changed the title
cgi-jhjsimpson
force-pushed
the
DMP-5586-add-missing-field-is-data-anonymised
branch
from
fb30228 to
500f5af
Compare
stephenokeefe
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
JIRA link
DMP-5586
Change description
Opening expired cases in darts-portal was causing 404 errors. The is_data_anonymised field has been added to the following endpoint responses to prevent this behaviour.
See ticket DMP-5437.
AI Specific Change description
Supported test writing and understanding around data flow.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")