Skip to content

[herd] Check that atomic pairs are actually pairs#1879

Closed
HadrienRenaud wants to merge 0 commit into
herd:fix-non-explicit-atomic-pairsfrom
HadrienRenaud:fix-non-explicit-atomic-pairs
Closed

[herd] Check that atomic pairs are actually pairs#1879
HadrienRenaud wants to merge 0 commit into
herd:fix-non-explicit-atomic-pairsfrom
HadrienRenaud:fix-non-explicit-atomic-pairs

Conversation

@HadrienRenaud

@HadrienRenaud HadrienRenaud commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please note the target of this PR

@maranget maranget left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, can you merge in PR #1876?

Comment thread herd/mem.ml
Comment on lines +2555 to +2559
let module PP = Pretty.Make(S) in
eprintf "Non-affine rmw relation!\n%a related to all of (%a)\n%!"
E.debug_event x E.debug_events ys;
PP.show_es_rfm test es S.RFMap.empty ;
Warn.fatal "Non-affine rmw relation!"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indentation, or the absence of indentation, or rhs surprises me, but I an live with that.

@HadrienRenaud HadrienRenaud force-pushed the fix-non-explicit-atomic-pairs branch from c4981d3 to 003d093 Compare June 23, 2026 11:53
@HadrienRenaud

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

(closed by push to the target branch, not the cleanest, apologies)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants