Skip to content

Demo: introduce ShellCheck violation#35

Closed
Daniel-Lopez246 wants to merge 2 commits into
fix/ci-pipelinefrom
demo-shellcheck-fail
Closed

Demo: introduce ShellCheck violation#35
Daniel-Lopez246 wants to merge 2 commits into
fix/ci-pipelinefrom
demo-shellcheck-fail

Conversation

@Daniel-Lopez246

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Add a demonstration function that intentionally violates ShellCheck guidelines to illustrate potential issues in the script. This serves as an example for developers to identify and fix such violations.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request adds a new function to the smoke_test.sh file. The primary purpose of this addition is to provide a clear, intentional example of a ShellCheck violation, enabling developers to better understand and address similar issues in their own codebases.

Highlights

  • Intentional ShellCheck Violation: Introduced a new function demo_shellcheck_break in smoke_test.sh that, according to the PR description, intentionally violates ShellCheck guidelines to serve as a demonstration and example for identifying and fixing such issues.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new function demo_shellcheck_break to Backend/test/smoke_test.sh. The review suggests simplifying this function by inlining the variable and using printf instead of echo for improved portability and safety, as echo's behavior can be inconsistent across shells and is flagged by ShellCheck (SC2028).

Comment on lines +91 to +92
local name="Sprint 7"
echo "$name"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This function can be simplified by inlining the variable. Also, printf is safer and more portable than echo for printing arbitrary data, as echo's behavior with backslashes or leading hyphens is not consistent across shells. This is flagged by ShellCheck as SC2028, which is likely the intended violation for this demo.

Suggested change
local name="Sprint 7"
echo "$name"
printf "Sprint 7\n"

@Daniel-Lopez246 Daniel-Lopez246 deleted the demo-shellcheck-fail branch April 18, 2026 01:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant