Update PR data Monthly collection (2025-12-02T01:21:19Z)#269
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @gounthar, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request provides an automated update to the project's PR statistics data, generated by a GitHub Action. It refreshes various consolidated metrics, such as PR counts by plugin, repository, state, status, and user, ensuring the data reflects the most recent activity. Additionally, new monthly data files for November 2025 have been introduced, capturing detailed PR information for that period. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughUpdates PR statistics data across multiple JSON files: consolidated metrics (plugin counts, repositories, states, statuses, users) and new monthly snapshots for November 2025 containing two PR records with merged/closed states and various metadata. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is an automated update of PR statistics. The data changes appear consistent with the new monthly data added. However, I've noticed that the process creates duplicate monthly files (prs_2025_11.json and filtered_prs_2025_11.json), which are identical. This is inefficient and could be confusing. My review includes a comment on this issue, suggesting a fix in the data generation script to avoid this duplication.
| [ | ||
| { | ||
| "number": 39, | ||
| "title": "chore(pom): Use recommended core version 2.504.3", | ||
| "state": "MERGED", | ||
| "createdAt": "2025-11-18T08:20:31Z", | ||
| "updatedAt": "2025-11-18T08:38:13Z", | ||
| "user": "jonesbusy", | ||
| "repository": "jenkinsci/extended-read-permission-plugin", | ||
| "pluginName": "extended-read-permission", | ||
| "labels": [ | ||
| "developer" | ||
| ], | ||
| "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/extended-read-permission-plugin/pull/39", | ||
| "description": "Hello extended-read-permission developers! 👋\nThis is an automated pull request created by the Jenkins Plugin Modernizer tool. The tool has applied the following recipes to modernize the plugin:\n\n Upgrade to the latest recommended core version and ensure the BOM matches the core version\n io.jenkins.tools.pluginmodernizer.UpgradeToRecommendCoreVersion\n Upgrade to the latest recommended core version and ensure the BOM matches the core version.\n\nWhy is this important?\nJenkins plugins declare a minimum supported Jenkins version.\nThe minimum Jenkins version is a useful way for plugin developers to indicate the range of Jenkins versions they are willing to support and test.\nSee the developer documentation to learn more about the recommended minimum Jenkins version.\nThe current minimum required Jenkins version is 2.504.3, which is why this pull request has been made.\nIf the plugin is already using the plugin bill of materials, then the bill of materials also needs to be updated with the matching artifactId for the minimum required Jenkins version.\nI can't see any change to the Jenkins version, how come?\nThis means your plugin POM was already using the 2.504.3 version but still required a few adjustments.\nThe checks fail, why?\nFor security reasons, the Jenkins infrastructure does not execute Jenkinsfiles proposed in pull requests.\nInstead, it builds the code using the Jenkinsfile from the default branch.\nIn this case, the existing Jenkinsfile specifies Java 8, not Java 17, which is causing the check to fail.\nTo resolve this,\na maintainer can replay the failed build\nby substituting the current Jenkinsfile content with our proposed changes using the \"replay the build\"\nfeature in Jenkins.\nPlease let us know if you need any assistance with this process.\nThanks for taking the time to review this PR.\n🙏", | ||
| "checkStatus": "SUCCESS" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "number": 173, | ||
| "title": "chore(pom): Use recommended core version 2.504.3, and Java 11", | ||
| "state": "CLOSED", | ||
| "createdAt": "2025-11-18T05:50:49Z", | ||
| "updatedAt": "2025-11-18T05:51:52Z", | ||
| "user": "jonesbusy", | ||
| "repository": "jenkinsci/extra-tool-installers-plugin", | ||
| "pluginName": "extra-tool-installers", | ||
| "labels": [ | ||
| "developer" | ||
| ], | ||
| "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/extra-tool-installers-plugin/pull/173", | ||
| "description": "Hello extra-tool-installers developers! 👋\nThis is an automated pull request created by the Jenkins Plugin Modernizer tool. The tool has applied the following recipes to modernize the plugin:\n\n Upgrade to the latest recommended core version and ensure the BOM matches the core version\n io.jenkins.tools.pluginmodernizer.UpgradeToRecommendCoreVersion\n Upgrade to the latest recommended core version and ensure the BOM matches the core version.\n\nWhy is this important?\nJenkins plugins declare a minimum supported Jenkins version.\nThe minimum Jenkins version is a useful way for plugin developers to indicate the range of Jenkins versions they are willing to support and test.\nSee the developer documentation to learn more about the recommended minimum Jenkins version.\nThe current minimum required Jenkins version is 2.504.3, which is why this pull request has been made.\nIf the plugin is already using the plugin bill of materials, then the bill of materials also needs to be updated with the matching artifactId for the minimum required Jenkins version.\nI can't see any change to the Jenkins version, how come?\nThis means your plugin POM was already using the 2.504.3 version but still required a few adjustments.\nThe checks fail, why?\nFor security reasons, the Jenkins infrastructure does not execute Jenkinsfiles proposed in pull requests.\nInstead, it builds the code using the Jenkinsfile from the default branch.\nIn this case, the existing Jenkinsfile specifies Java 8, not Java 11, which is causing the check to fail.\nTo resolve this,\na maintainer can replay the failed build\nby substituting the current Jenkinsfile content with our proposed changes using the \"replay the build\"\nfeature in Jenkins.\nPlease let us know if you need any assistance with this process.\nThanks for taking the time to review this PR.\n🙏", | ||
| "checkStatus": "PENDING" | ||
| } | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This file is an exact duplicate of data/monthly/prs_2025_11.json. This duplication seems to stem from the collect-monthly.sh script, which copies the raw data file to a 'filtered' file without any actual filtering (jq '.'). Later, the script appears to process both files when consolidating data, which is inefficient. It would be best to avoid creating this duplicate file or adjust the consolidation step to only use one of the files to prevent confusion and redundant processing.
1 participant
This PR contains automatically updated PR statistics data. Generated by GitHub Actions.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.