Skip to content

gnutls: add GnuProject source_provenance (un-dark the vuln scan, surfaces CVE-2025-32988)#258

Open
bryan-minimal wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dark-gnutls-provenance
Open

gnutls: add GnuProject source_provenance (un-dark the vuln scan, surfaces CVE-2025-32988)#258
bryan-minimal wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dark-gnutls-provenance

Conversation

@bryan-minimal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

Adds source_provenance = GnuProject "gnutls" to gnutls's build.ncl.

Why

gnutls was one of the 66 "dark" packages — no source_provenance, so the vuln scanner never queried it and reported 0/0/0. It's actually sitting on a HIGH: CVE-2025-32988 affects the pinned 3.8.9.

GnuProject "gnutls"pkg:generic/gnu/gnutls, which resolves via the existing cpe_remap (gnu:gnutls) — so no supply-chain change is needed, the scan path (pm#193) lights up immediately.

Verified locally

  • pkgmgr vulns --package gnutls → now reports CVE-2025-32988 (HIGH) (was 0/0/0).
  • pkgmgr check --package gnutls → still resolves cleanly (up-to-date at 3.8.9). Note: the fix is in the unreleased 3.8.10, so there's no bump available yet — this is a track-until-fix-ships HIGH, surfaced now instead of hidden.

First of the dark-package provenance backfill from the 66-package audit (wf w4kghqujr). mesa + dnsutils follow (those also need a cpe_remap row in supply-chain).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

gnutls had no source_provenance, so the vuln scanner emitted no query for it
and reported 0/0/0 — despite a real HIGH (CVE-2025-32988) affecting the pinned
3.8.9. GnuProject → pkg:generic/gnu/gnutls resolves via the existing cpe_remap
to NVD's gnu:gnutls, so the scan now correctly flags it. Verified locally:
`pkgmgr vulns --package gnutls` now reports CVE-2025-32988 (HIGH); the upstream
version check still resolves cleanly (up-to-date at 3.8.9 — the fix is in the
unreleased 3.8.10, so this is a track-until-fix-ships HIGH with no bump yet).

First of the dark-package provenance backfill (66-package audit, wf w4kghqujr).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@bryan-minimal, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 1 hour, 32 minutes, and 23 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7aa11403-77d8-483e-bb18-8de9f7add4d8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 263ba22 and b0583ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/gnutls/build.ncl
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch dark-gnutls-provenance

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant