Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Replace O(N*M) loops with O(N) hash map lookups#134

Open
glacy wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimization-onm-loop-17958961612417085706
Open

⚡ Bolt: Replace O(N*M) loops with O(N) hash map lookups#134
glacy wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimization-onm-loop-17958961612417085706

Conversation

@glacy

@glacy glacy commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced nested O(N*M) array searches with O(N) hash map lookups in MaterialExtractor.get_all_exercises and RAGIndexer.index_materials.
🎯 Why: In large repositories, searching through a solutions array linearly for every single exercise creates an O(N²) scaling bottleneck. Pre-computing a hash map allows for O(1) lookups, fixing the performance degradation.
📊 Impact: Expected to reduce extraction and indexing times significantly for repositories with hundreds or thousands of exercises, dropping search complexity from O(N²) to O(N).
🔬 Measurement: Verified against the baseline test suite via mocked unit tests, ensuring no functionality or default "first-match" semantics were broken.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 17958961612417085706 started by @glacy

Co-authored-by: glacy <1131951+glacy@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 15, 2026 18:13

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR optimizes exercise/solution matching by replacing nested per-exercise linear scans with per-material hash map lookups, improving scalability for large material sets while preserving “first-match” semantics.

Changes:

  • Precompute solutions_by_label maps to avoid O(N*M) solution lookups in MaterialExtractor.get_all_exercises and RAGIndexer.index_materials.
  • Preserve prior first-match behavior when multiple solutions share the same exercise_label by only inserting the first occurrence.
  • Apply formatting / minor import cleanup consistent with the repo’s Ruff/Black style.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
evolutia/rag/rag_indexer.py Uses a per-material solutions_by_label dict for O(1) solution lookup during indexing.
evolutia/material_extractor.py Uses a per-material solutions_by_label dict for O(1) solution lookup when aggregating exercises.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +288 to +300
# Generar embeddings
embeddings = self._generate_embeddings_batch(chunks)

# Sincronizar chunks con embeddings (por si se filtraron vacíos en _generate_embeddings_batch)
# Aunque aquí preferimos filtrar antes para mantener consistencia
valid_indices = [i for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks) if chunk and chunk.strip()]
chunks = [chunks[i] for i in valid_indices]

if not chunks:
logger.warning(
f"Ejercicio {exercise.get('label', 'unknown')} no tiene contenido válido para indexar"
)
return []
Comment on lines +348 to +359
# Generar embeddings
embeddings = self._generate_embeddings_batch(chunks)

# Sincronizar chunks con embeddings
valid_indices = [i for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks) if chunk and chunk.strip()]
chunks = [chunks[i] for i in valid_indices]

if not chunks:
logger.warning(
f"Lectura {metadata.get('title', 'unknown')} no tiene contenido válido para indexar"
)
return []
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants