Skip to content

chore(regions): bump webhooks to v2.4.1#387

Merged
flemzord merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/update-regions-webhooks-v2.4.1
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

chore(regions): bump webhooks to v2.4.1#387
flemzord merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/update-regions-webhooks-v2.4.1

Conversation

@flemzord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changed

  • Updated Regions webhooks versions from v2.4.0 to v2.4.1 for stack files v2.1, v2.2, v3.0, v3.1, and v3.2.
  • Bumped the regions chart from 3.10.6 to 3.10.7.
  • Bumped the formance chart from 1.13.3 to 1.13.4 because it depends on regions, and refreshed charts/formance/Chart.lock to point at regions 3.10.7.
  • Regenerated chart README files and the root chart index.

Validation

  • env DOCKER_CONFIG=/tmp/codex-helm-docker-config HELM_REGISTRY_CONFIG=/tmp/codex-helm-config/registry.json nix develop --command just pc

Note: the local shell did not have just directly available, so the requested just pc workflow was run from the repository Nix dev shell. The recipe emitted non-blocking GITHUB_TOKEN/helm-login warnings, then completed successfully with all charts linted/rendered and 0 issues.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@flemzord, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 28 minutes and 47 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0b74cc72-2602-4b5d-b432-6e0451d01545

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60b67d7 and 55401b6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • charts/formance/Chart.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock, !**/*.lock
  • charts/formance/Chart.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • charts/regions/Chart.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • charts/regions/values.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md
  • charts/formance/README.md
  • charts/regions/README.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/update-regions-webhooks-v2.4.1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@flemzord flemzord marked this pull request as ready for review June 15, 2026 10:02
@flemzord flemzord requested a review from a team as a code owner June 15, 2026 10:02
@flemzord flemzord merged commit e0685a4 into main Jun 15, 2026
5 checks passed
@flemzord flemzord deleted the feat/update-regions-webhooks-v2.4.1 branch June 15, 2026 10:02

@NumaryBot NumaryBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Approve — automated review

The changes consistently bump the regions and formance chart versions, update the formance lock dependency, and reflect the webhooks version updates in values and generated READMEs. No blocking correctness issues were found.

No findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants