Skip to content

ci: rename the Checks gate all to all-checks#479

Merged
etrobert merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/rename-checks-gate
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

ci: rename the Checks gate all to all-checks#479
etrobert merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/rename-checks-gate

Conversation

@etrobert-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What

Rename the Checks workflow's aggregation gate allall-checks, to pair symmetrically with the Build workflow's all-builds gate (#478):

Checks / all-checks
Build  / all-builds

Each now says "all checks / all builds"; both are unique (branch protection matches by bare job name, so they can't share all).

⚠️ Required-status change (pairs with #478 and a branch-protection edit)

This renames the required check-run context allall-checks, so it must be updated in branch protection or main blocks on a missing all. Do it together with #478:

End state for main's required status checks: all-checks + all-builds (remove all).

Both names become selectable in the settings picker once they've run on their PRs. Recommended: get both PRs green, update the required checks to all-checks + all-builds in one edit, then merge.

Verification

  • actionlint, yamllint --strict → clean

Pair it with the Build workflow's all-builds gate for a symmetric,
per-workflow naming scheme. Both can't be 'all' since branch protection
matches required checks by bare job name.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@etrobert etrobert force-pushed the ci/rename-checks-gate branch from 57abf09 to a662ac8 Compare July 8, 2026 14:05
@etrobert etrobert enabled auto-merge (squash) July 8, 2026 14:08
@etrobert etrobert merged commit b2e584c into main Jul 8, 2026
16 checks passed
@etrobert etrobert deleted the ci/rename-checks-gate branch July 8, 2026 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants