Skip to content

EVM Gas Points#29

Open
SamWilsn wants to merge 3 commits into
ethsteel:mainfrom
SamWilsn:patch-2
Open

EVM Gas Points#29
SamWilsn wants to merge 3 commits into
ethsteel:mainfrom
SamWilsn:patch-2

Conversation

@SamWilsn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I don't understand the difference between assigning 1 and 3 points here.

Imagine a change that modifies an existing gas mechanism that affects existing tests. Under the current rules, it would be assigned one point. A new mechanism doing the same would be assigned three points.

I would argue that the distinction between a new mechanism and a modification is immaterial to the complexity of a change when it requires test modifications. As an aside, new vs. modification is a very subjective criterion.

This change is one possible solution. I don't necessarily believe it is the correct one.

@fselmo fselmo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me 👍🏼

Also not sure it's the most "correct" but it is much clearer how to rate imo.

@Carsons-Eels Carsons-Eels left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a good update, even if it's not ideal. It clarifies the rules sufficiently that it is worth merging on it's own. We can always continue to refine it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants