idea1-minh

[QuangMinh07112003]

No description provided.

[malenamalka]

This is a good starting point. I would recommend going a bit deeper into your idea brainstorming. Could you specify which indicators you want to look at in your research question? Also, when you list your possible methods, could you explain how each variable would fit into your analysis?
You do not address any stakes or ethical or legal concerns, so make sure to address that next time! Finally, a lot of research has been done on this topic. What are you adding to the conversation? What makes this topic special and worth looking at?

[QuangMinh07112003]

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zmF_ONfYQyZA16qCLzcxxT7_05vA1flgWphsZKB_U-s/edit?usp=sharing

[ernbilen]

Final presentation comments:
-More explanation of models, their historical development etc would help the audience understand them better.
-Focusing more on industry and type of crisis is probably the most interesting part.
-Would you be able to cluster based on performance?
-Should find ways to make the presentation more engaging. Like, maybe start with a thought experiment where you have your savings of $1,000 and discuss what you could do with it. Or focus on one big investment company that did better and another that did worse and discuss why they may have done worse or better. What are they optimizing on? When you invest it helps to know how the returns are being generated.
-I liked your stakeholders implications but the connection between this section and the presentation content could be improved. Maybe you can take each and connect with part in the slides you discussed.
-I think imprecision in simulation implications should be under stakeholder implications instead of ethics.
-Under ethics could discuss things like, whose money is being lost the most when a crisis hits, working class family savings etc. To motivate discussions here you can always find information online like news articles etc.