don't send multiline responses to CAP LS 301#2068
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This is more or less explicitly prohibited by the spec: https://ircv3.net/specs/extensions/capability-negotiation.html#multiline-replies-to-cap-ls-and-cap-list
Member
Author
|
This should get a changelog entry because it technically changes the behavior (some draft caps will be hidden from 301 clients now; it's theoretically possible that this affects someone's scripted extension). |
Member
Author
|
Relative to 2.11, we will be hiding: cap-notify draft/account-registration draft/channel-rename draft/languages draft/multiline draft/persistence draft/read-marker extended-monitor |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is more or less explicitly prohibited by the spec:
https://ircv3.net/specs/extensions/capability-negotiation.html#multiline-replies-to-cap-ls-and-cap-list
See progval/irctest#205 ; #2065 here caused the CAP LS 301 response to spill onto two lines, breaking SASL in irssi and possibly other clients.