v4.0.0 - ontology version 2 implementation#29
Conversation
…hod:paymentMethodType
|
Hi @lecoqlibre Can you include:
|
mkllnk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rename:: Enterprise -> Organization (Enterprise is deprecated)
Does that mean that there will still be a deprecated Enterprise class?
The UML code is not human readable and I haven't tried the Eclipse plugin yet. I think that I should try this out in the code generator and see the changes in the Ruby code. So far, the listed breaking changes don't affect us at all because we don't use those features yet.
Garethe's point is critical. We are updating these models to get the certification data. That was the whole point.
|
In terms of upgrading. My best idea for the Ruby connector is to release a 1.x version of the gem under a different name with a different namespace. Then we can release a 2.x version with the current namespace. This would allow Ruby projects to include both versions and support both APIs. Does that sound reasonable to you, @lecoqlibre? |
OK so the Changelog is missing the Certification class. Properties are here but not the class. I've opened datafoodconsortium/ontology#216. Yes I will add the Certification class and its related properties.
Yes I've left the Enterprise class.
Yes, sure. |
Add isCertifiedBy object property to Organization class.
|
I've added the I've opened three ontology issues related to this:
I've created the class |
- Features - Properties - Geometry - Point - Polygon
…rowsable) The type was IEnterprise so I changed it to IOrganization.
mkllnk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can't interpret these files as text but the Changelog looks good. I will need to review this on the Connector.
Added
Context:
Classes
Changed
Fixed
Removed