Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 3, 2026. It is now read-only.

[WIP] Porting dbcDeploy on API v2.0#46

Open
MaxGekk wants to merge 7 commits into
databricks:masterfrom
MaxGekk:porting-on-api_v2.0
Open

[WIP] Porting dbcDeploy on API v2.0#46
MaxGekk wants to merge 7 commits into
databricks:masterfrom
MaxGekk:porting-on-api_v2.0

Conversation

@MaxGekk

@MaxGekk MaxGekk commented Mar 13, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The uploadJar() and attachToCluster() methods are overwritten and ported on REST API v2.0.

@MaxGekk MaxGekk requested review from JoshRosen and brkyvz March 25, 2018 16:32
@MaxGekk

MaxGekk commented Mar 25, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@brkyvz @JoshRosen In general, do you agree with the changes?

Comment thread build.sbt Outdated
scalaVersion := "2.10.4"
scalaVersion := "2.10.7"

resolvers += Resolver.bintrayRepo("maxgekk", "maven")

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unfortunately we can't use your repo :(

@brkyvz

brkyvz commented Mar 25, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MaxGekk Unfortunately we can't directly link to the library you have developed :/ It needs to be maintained within the databricks org.

@MaxGekk

MaxGekk commented Mar 25, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@brkyvz In the case if I would include all source code from my library needed to port the plugin on API v2.0 into this PR, it would be ok for you?

@brkyvz

brkyvz commented Mar 25, 2018 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@calvinlfer

calvinlfer commented Apr 26, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello @brkyvz and @MaxGekk , any update on this?
It would be really great to have this functionality 👍

Also, not sure if there's any plans to support SBT 1.x but that would be great too

@MaxGekk

MaxGekk commented May 6, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@brkyvz I have included all source codes to the PR. Could you, please, look at CI build. Can we exclude jdk6 and jdk7?

@brkyvz

brkyvz commented May 7, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We probably can. @gatorsmile and team will now own maintaining this plugin.

@calvinlfer

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Failing for JDK 7, the Base64 functionality isn't part of java.util it seems :-(
object Base64 is not a member of package java.util

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants