Skip to content

Release 4.0#612

Draft
dariok wants to merge 234 commits into
masterfrom
development
Draft

Release 4.0#612
dariok wants to merge 234 commits into
masterfrom
development

Conversation

@dariok
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@dariok dariok commented Nov 1, 2025

No description provided.

dariok and others added 30 commits April 3, 2024 22:34
we format error pages in error.xqm; passing this through a handler will output HTML code in an HTML page instead of showing the desired output

Cf. #343 #304
Otherwise, RESTXQ might not work
I forgot this in 0261e1e
a relative link will obviously only work from projects.html – but this may also be called
from toc.html with results in a toc.html for only a project without a working link
to the admin pages.

reverts 370fe43
Closes #556
shouldn't wdbFile be wdbFiles?
replaced by info in wdbFiles:getFullPath()

Cf. #549
Also, remove depency from app.xqm

Cf. #549
only use templates:apply when a GET request has been made
for now, only return the method (which should be enough to return headers)

Cf. #529
currently, only in German, i18n pending
Also, a bit of stylebook
- button/@data-note will be @xml:id if that is present to reflect the way the ID is contructed in fnText
- create groups of footnotes (by @type)
- create a <hr> when a new series of footnotes starts
relies on implementation of actual save and meta data actions in rest-common.xqm
reduces the number of changes necessary should the index change
includes storing and entering meta data
needs testing and bug fixes
In tests, we assume and ensure that files are uploaded to `edition`

Cf. #622 #615 #577
previously, the wrong wdbmeta was loaded, hence there were entries left after the DELETE operation

Cf. #615 #577
Cf. #578 #621
Closes #474 – superseded by API v2, which returns 404
…nformation

Also, only use `allOrigins` header as `Allow` headers are only expected for `OPTIONS`;
and handle `If-Modified-Since` the same way as in GET view

Cf. #578
reduce interference by using common login functions and shared Projects per test

Cf. #379 #578
Use “project”, “file”, and “peer”
hitherto uncxaught

Cf. #619 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants