-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
Relax Textual constraint from == to >=
#196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: daaain/claude-code-log
Length of output: 7386
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: daaain/claude-code-log
Length of output: 6363
🌐 Web query:
Textual Python TUI library changelog breaking changes since version 8.0.0💡 Result:
As of June 3, 2026, version 8.0.0 is a historical release of the Textual library (released February 16, 2026) [1][2]. The primary breaking change introduced in version 8.0.0 was the renaming of the Select.BLANK constant to Select.NULL to resolve a naming conflict with the newly introduced Widget.BLANK Classvar [1][3][4]. Additional behavioral changes noted in the 8.0.0 release that may impact existing applications include: 1. Screen Dismissal Behavior: Dismissing a non-active screen is no longer a no-op (no-operation) and no longer triggers a warning [1][3]. While the dismissal still functions, users should be aware that the screen may not update if the current mode is not active [1][5]. 2. Screen Switching Delay: A 50ms delay was added when switching screens to allow for state updates and to prevent visual flickering (janky flash) of old content [1][3]. Since version 8.0.0, there have been no further breaking changes documented in the official changelog up to version 8.2.7 (current as of May 2026) [2][6]. Subsequent releases (8.1.0 through 8.2.7) have primarily focused on additive features, performance improvements (such as smooth scrolling for large documents), and bug fixes [2][6].
Citations:
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: daaain/claude-code-log
Length of output: 121
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: daaain/claude-code-log
Length of output: 1298
Add an upper bound to the
textualdependencytextual.widgets.Select/Select.*usage found in the codebase, anddismiss()calls are limited toself.dismiss(...)withinModalScreenaction methods.textual>=6.5.0with no upper bound lets future major releases break the app; constrain it (e.g.,<9.0).Suggested constraint
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if I want to add a hard upper bound, isn't it better for the library consumers to decide? We have a uv.lock and if there's a breakage later we can see how to deal with it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daaain, that's a fair point. For an application shipped with auv.lock, the lockfile already pins exact versions for reproducible installs, so an upper bound in the constraint adds less value than it would for a pure library. The PR's goal of easing Nixpkgs packaging also aligns better with a looser bound. Happy to leave it as>=6.5.0.( ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ )
✏️ Learnings added