Skip to content

Add yarn backend doc#224

Open
fhoering wants to merge 1 commit into
criteo-forks:criteo-masterfrom
fhoering:add_yarn_backend_doc
Open

Add yarn backend doc#224
fhoering wants to merge 1 commit into
criteo-forks:criteo-masterfrom
fhoering:add_yarn_backend_doc

Conversation

@fhoering

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)

How is this patch tested?

(Details)

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

  • area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
  • area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
  • area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
  • area/examples: Example code
  • area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
  • area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
  • area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
  • area/scoring: Local serving, model deployment tools, spark UDFs
  • area/server-infra: MLflow server, JavaScript dev server
  • area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

  • area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, JavaScript, plotting
  • area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
  • area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
  • area/windows: Windows support

Language

  • language/r: R APIs and clients
  • language/java: Java APIs and clients
  • language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

  • integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
  • integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
  • integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

  • rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
  • rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
  • rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

jcuquemelle
jcuquemelle previously approved these changes Aug 13, 2020
t-henri
t-henri previously approved these changes Aug 13, 2020
@fhoering
fhoering dismissed stale reviews from t-henri and jcuquemelle via 638f8b1 September 1, 2020 08:07
@fhoering
fhoering force-pushed the add_yarn_backend_doc branch from 37c0e87 to 638f8b1 Compare September 1, 2020 08:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants