Skip to content

Added additional tests for CqlIntervalOperatorsTest as suggested by Claude #128

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
bryantaustin13 wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Added additional tests for CqlIntervalOperatorsTest as suggested by Claude #128

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
87 changes: 65 additions & 22 deletions tests/cql/CqlIntervalOperatorsTest.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -709,8 +709,9 @@
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<test name="TestInNullBoundaries" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- Closed null boundaries => maximum interval [min,max]; per CQL spec "in" (https://cql.hl7.org/09-b-cqlreference.html#in): a null closed boundary comparison is considered true. So 5 is included. -->
<expression>5 in Interval[null, null]</expression>
<output>false</output>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="IntegerIntervalInTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1141,31 +1142,32 @@
</test>
<test name="DateTimeMeetsBeforeTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 7), DateTime(2012, 1, 14)] meets Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 15), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 7), DateTime(2012, 1, 14)] meets before Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 15), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="DateTimeMeetsBeforeFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 7), DateTime(2012, 1, 14)] meets Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 20), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 7), DateTime(2012, 1, 14)] meets before Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 20), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
<test name="TimeMeetsBeforeTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[@T04:59:59.999, @T09:59:59.999] meets Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999]</expression>
<expression>Interval[@T04:59:59.999, @T09:59:59.999] meets before Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="TimeMeetsBeforeFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[@T04:59:59.999, @T09:59:59.999] meets Interval[@T10:12:00.000, @T19:59:59.999]</expression>
<expression>Interval[@T04:59:59.999, @T09:59:59.999] meets before Interval[@T10:12:00.000, @T19:59:59.999]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
</group>
<group name="MeetsAfter" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<test name="TestMeetsAfterNull" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- open/unknown null boundaries make the boundary comparison indeterminate -> null; per CQL spec "meets after" (https://cql.hl7.org/09-b-cqlreference.html#meets-after) -->
<expression>Interval(null, 5] meets after Interval[11, null)</expression>
<output>false</output>
<output>null</output>
</test>
<test name="IntegerIntervalMeetsAfterTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1199,22 +1201,22 @@
</test>
<test name="DateTimeMeetsAfterTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 15), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)] meets Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 7), DateTime(2012, 1, 14)]</expression>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 15), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)] meets after Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 7), DateTime(2012, 1, 14)]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="DateTimeMeetsAfterFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 20), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)] meets Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 7), DateTime(2012, 1, 14)]</expression>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 20), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)] meets after Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 7), DateTime(2012, 1, 14)]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
<test name="TimeMeetsAfterTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999] meets Interval[@T04:59:59.999, @T09:59:59.999]</expression>
<expression>Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999] meets after Interval[@T04:59:59.999, @T09:59:59.999]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="TimeMeetsAfterFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[@T10:12:00.000, @T19:59:59.999] meets Interval[@T04:59:59.999, @T09:59:59.999]</expression>
<expression>Interval[@T10:12:00.000, @T19:59:59.999] meets after Interval[@T04:59:59.999, @T09:59:59.999]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
</group>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1575,22 +1577,22 @@
</test>
<test name="DateTimeOverlapsBeforeTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)] overlaps Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 15), DateTime(2012, 1, 28)]</expression>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)] overlaps before Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 15), DateTime(2012, 1, 28)]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="DateTimeOverlapsBeforeFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)] overlaps Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 26), DateTime(2012, 1, 28)]</expression>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)] overlaps before Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 26), DateTime(2012, 1, 28)]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
<test name="TimeOverlapsBeforeTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999] overlaps Interval[@T12:00:00.000, @T21:59:59.999]</expression>
<expression>Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999] overlaps before Interval[@T12:00:00.000, @T21:59:59.999]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="TimeOverlapsBeforeFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999] overlaps Interval[@T20:00:00.000, @T21:59:59.999]</expression>
<expression>Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999] overlaps before Interval[@T20:00:00.000, @T21:59:59.999]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
</group>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1674,31 +1676,31 @@
</test>
<test name="DateTimeOverlapsAfterTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 15), DateTime(2012, 1, 28)] overlaps Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 15), DateTime(2012, 1, 28)] overlaps after Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="DateTimeOverlapsAfterFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 26), DateTime(2012, 1, 28)] overlaps Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
<expression>Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 26), DateTime(2012, 1, 28)] overlaps after Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
<test name="TimeOverlapsAfterTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[@T12:00:00.000, @T21:59:59.999] overlaps Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999]</expression>
<expression>Interval[@T12:00:00.000, @T21:59:59.999] overlaps after Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
<test name="TimeOverlapsAfterFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[@T20:00:00.000, @T21:59:59.999] overlaps Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999]</expression>
<expression>Interval[@T20:00:00.000, @T21:59:59.999] overlaps after Interval[@T10:00:00.000, @T19:59:59.999]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
</group>
<group name="PointFrom" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<test name="TestPointFromNull" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>point from Interval[null, null]</expression>
<output>null</output>
<!-- extracting a point from the maximum interval is a run-time error per spec "point from" (https://cql.hl7.org/09-b-cqlreference.html#point-from): "attempting to extract a point from the maximum interval (Interval[null, null]) will result in an error" -->
<expression invalid="true">point from Interval[null, null]</expression>
</test>
<test name="TestPointFromInteger" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2066,10 +2068,12 @@
</test>
<test name="DateTimeWidth" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- invalid: width is not defined for Date/DateTime/Time intervals (use duration or difference instead); per CQL spec "width" (https://cql.hl7.org/09-b-cqlreference.html#width): "because CQL defines duration and difference operations for date and time valued intervals, width is not defined for intervals of these types" -->
<expression invalid="true">width of Interval[DateTime(2012, 1, 5), DateTime(2012, 1, 25)]</expression>
</test>
<test name="TimeWidth" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- invalid: width is not defined for Date/DateTime/Time intervals (use duration or difference instead); per CQL spec "width" (https://cql.hl7.org/09-b-cqlreference.html#width): "because CQL defines duration and difference operations for date and time valued intervals, width is not defined for intervals of these types" -->
<expression invalid="true">width of Interval[@T05:59:59.999, @T15:59:59.999]</expression>
</test>
</group>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2167,13 +2171,52 @@
</test>
<test name="InvalidIntegerInterval" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- invalid: the ending boundary must be greater than or equal to the starting boundary; per CQL Author's Guide "Interval Values" (https://cql.hl7.org/02-authorsguide.html#interval-values) an interval's low boundary must be <= its high boundary -->
<expression invalid="true">Interval[5, 3]</expression>
<!-- EXPECT: Invalid Interval - the ending boundary must be greater than or equal to the starting boundary. -->
</test>
<test name="InvalidIntegerIntervalA" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- invalid: open high boundary makes the effective end predecessor(5) = 4, which is less than the closed start 5; per CQL Author's Guide "Interval Values" (https://cql.hl7.org/02-authorsguide.html#interval-values) an interval's low boundary must be <= its high boundary -->
<expression invalid="true">Interval[5, 5)</expression>
<!-- EXPECT: Invalid Interval - the ending boundary must be greater than or equal to the starting boundary. -->
</test>
</group>
<group name="Size" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<test name="SizeTest" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- (end - start) + point-size; [3,7] contains 5 points -->
<expression>Size(Interval[3, 7])</expression>
<output>5</output>
</test>
<test name="SizeTestOpen" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- open high: end = predecessor(8) = 7; same 5 points -->
<expression>Size(Interval[3, 8))</expression>
<output>5</output>
</test>
<test name="SizeIsNull" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Size(null as Interval&lt;Integer&gt;)</expression>
<output>null</output>
</test>
</group>
<group name="NotEquivalent" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<test name="IntegerIntervalNotEquivalentFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[0, 5] !~ Interval[0, 5]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
<test name="IntervalNotEquivalentNullBoundaryFalse" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<!-- equivalent even with matching null boundaries -->
<expression>Interval[1, null] !~ Interval[1, null]</expression>
<output>false</output>
</test>
<test name="IntegerIntervalNotEquivalentTrue" version="1.0">
<capability code="interval-operators"/>
<expression>Interval[-1, 7] !~ Interval[0, 7]</expression>
<output>true</output>
</test>
</group>
</tests>
Loading