Skip to content

chore: MCP Registry listing prep (v2.1.1)#25

Open
cloudbring wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/mcp-registry-2.1.1
Open

chore: MCP Registry listing prep (v2.1.1)#25
cloudbring wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/mcp-registry-2.1.1

Conversation

@cloudbring

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Prepares publication to the official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), where two other New Relic servers are listed and this one is absent.

  • mcpName: io.github.cloudbring/newrelic-mcp in package.json — the registry's npm ownership check requires it in the published artifact, hence the 2.1.1 bump
  • server.json (schema 2025-12-11): npm/stdio package with NEW_RELIC_API_KEY / NEW_RELIC_ACCOUNT_ID / NEW_RELIC_REGION
  • README installation section rewritten: npx-first, MCP Registry, current smithery CLI syntax; fixes the pre-migration Smithery URLs (old server/@cloudbring/... path and the retired @smithery/cli install flow)

Merging auto-publishes 2.1.1 to npm (same OIDC pipeline as 2.1.0). After that, registry publication is two commands with GitHub device-flow auth:

mcp-publisher login github
mcp-publisher publish

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_012xEutmxJq5Ad1VdFyfzEhQ

- mcpName io.github.cloudbring/newrelic-mcp in package.json (registry
  ownership verification for npm packages)
- server.json (schema 2025-12-11): stdio transport, env vars incl.
  NEW_RELIC_REGION
- README: npx-first install, MCP Registry section, current smithery CLI
  syntax; fix pre-migration Smithery URLs
- 2.1.1 so the registry points at an npm artifact that carries mcpName

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012xEutmxJq5Ad1VdFyfzEhQ
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@cloudbring, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 3 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b5be9b3f-67e4-4fe0-91e9-60622eeb029b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc6e426 and f50a9fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • README.md
  • package.json
  • server.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/mcp-registry-2.1.1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant