docs(architecture): implementation-gated canonical service-boundary contract

[chitcommit]

What

Adds docs/architecture/service-boundary-contract.md — a governance contract that captures the canon-aligned ChittyOS service-boundary model and makes its enforcement explicitly implementation-gated.

The model it records as a target:

Orchestrator               = thin session viewport (ephemeral working memory)
ChittyEntity/ChittyContext = persistent synthetic identity (ChittyID, ledger, DNA, trust)
ChittyID                   = identity minting
ChittyConnect              = context binding / connectivity
ChittyRouter               = routing
ChittyAuth                 = auth / access
ChittyCanon                = ontology / canonical rules

Why

The model is canonically consistent as a target, but current code/capability evidence (per the 2026-06-12 adversarial review) is only partially aligned: several named repos (chittyconnect, chittyauth, chittyid, and chittyrouter on hold) reportedly carry copied/stale ChittyCanon charter/package identity rather than their own — i.e. repo_identity_drift. The contract therefore must not pretend the boundaries are deployed.

What's in the doc

• Implementation-gating disclaimer at the top: cross-reference canon and current repo code before enforcing any boundary; if they conflict, mark canonical_drift_blocked / repo_identity_drift; never assume a service is implemented because canon names it.
• Drift-status vocabulary split into a canon axis and a code axis (canon_confirmed, canon_directional, code_confirmed, code_drift, repo_identity_drift, design_proposed, hold_blocked, canonical_drift_blocked).
• Boundary evidence table from the review, with each external-repo code finding flagged as reported, not independently re-verified in this repo.
• Enforcement rule + capability-governor rule (do not invent a boundary without canonical evidence; ChittyTasks stays design_proposed).
• Grounds the Person (P, Synthetic) actor-class claim in the service's own live T→P ChittyID re-mint already recorded in CHARTER.md.

Scope / honesty notes

• Pure docs addition — no code, schema, or runtime changes.
• Findings about other repositories are attributed to the 2026-06-12 review and are not independently re-verified here (GitHub scope for this session is chittyos/chittycommand only). They are recorded as code_drift flags to confirm, not as settled fact.
• Status is DRAFT / version: 0.1.0 — intended to be updated boundary-by-boundary as repos shed identity drift and earn code_confirmed.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01886crB52Jw3LWiqPh33WUM

---

Generated by Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@chitcommit, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 30 minutes and 39 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 56e585ce-5270-4cb9-b2fe-5865e9b42b62

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 05683d8 and cc9767e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/architecture/service-boundary-contract.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch claude/gracious-turing-dixr3k

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying with    Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status	Name	Latest Commit	Updated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful! View logs	chittycommand	cc9767e	Jun 15 2026, 05:02 AM

[github-actions]

1. @coderabbitai review
2. @copilot review
3. @codex review
4. @claude review
   Adversarial review request: evaluate security, policy bypass paths, regression risk, and merge-gating bypass attempts.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

To use Codex here, create a Codex account and connect to github.

[github-actions]

1. @coderabbitai review
2. @copilot review
3. @codex review
4. @claude review
   Adversarial review request: evaluate security, policy bypass paths, regression risk, and merge-gating bypass attempts.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

To use Codex here, create a Codex account and connect to github.