Skip to content

refactor: multisync improvements#2007

Draft
jarekr-da wants to merge 5 commits into
jarekr/sdk_synchronizersfrom
jarekr/multisync-core-refactor
Draft

refactor: multisync improvements#2007
jarekr-da wants to merge 5 commits into
jarekr/sdk_synchronizersfrom
jarekr/multisync-core-refactor

Conversation

@jarekr-da

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Viktor-Kalashnykov-da and others added 5 commits June 15, 2026 14:01
Signed-off-by: vkalashnykov <viktor.kalashnykov@digitalasset.com>
Signed-off-by: vkalashnykov <viktor.kalashnykov@digitalasset.com>
Signed-off-by: vkalashnykov <viktor.kalashnykov@digitalasset.com>
Add SynchronizerCache.resolveSynchronizerIdByAlias and the public LedgerNamespace.getSynchronizerIdByAlias, and refactor resolveGlobalSynchronizerId to delegate to the generalized lookup. Keeps all synchronizer-resolution/caching logic within the synchronizer refactor.

Signed-off-by: jarekr-da <jaroslaw.ratajski@digitalasset.com>
…mprovements

Squashes the non-synchronizer changes from the original jarekr/sdk_synchronizers branch on top of the synchronizer refactor (Part 1): move shared multi-sync example logic into core packages (test-token, amulet-ops, trading-app); add the localnet helper and default auth config; add vitest configs and test-coverage setup; export vetDarIdempotent; SDK reference renames.

Signed-off-by: jarekr-da <jaroslaw.ratajski@digitalasset.com>
@jarekr-da jarekr-da self-assigned this Jun 15, 2026
@jarekr-da jarekr-da force-pushed the jarekr/sdk_synchronizers branch from 0256183 to 51c5d16 Compare June 15, 2026 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants