-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Fix POSIX portability, Source0 naming, and License tags in RPM specs and e2e tests #5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,16 +1,12 @@ | ||||||
| %define packname Xnee | ||||||
| %define packname xnee | ||||||
|
||||||
| %define packname xnee | |
| %define packname Xnee |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The same
packnamechange fromXneetoxneecreates an identical mismatch with the CI pipeline in.github/workflows/el6.yml.After this change,
Source0resolves to.../xnee-%{version}.tar.gzand%setup -q -n %{packname}-%{version}expects a directory namedxnee-<version>inside the archive. However, the EL6 CI workflow (.github/workflows/el6.yml, lines 119–120, 150) creates and copies a tarball namedXnee-${XNEE_VERSION}.tar.gzwith an archive prefixXnee-<version>/. This will causerpmbuildto fail at the%prepstage: the source filexnee-<version>.tar.gzwill not be found, and%setupwould also fail to find thexnee-<version>directory inside the archive.The CI workflows need to be updated to use lowercase
xnee-${XNEE_VERSION}.tar.gz/--prefix="xnee-${XNEE_VERSION}/"to match the updated spec, or the specpacknameshould stay asXnee.