-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Add detail to KNN no-match explanations #16271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
04e9676
dd1a52e
5e03bf0
68c75ab
e2f6b1f
0d4c06c
eb489ef
f479a5b
39c24d1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -151,9 +151,65 @@ public Query rewrite(IndexSearcher indexSearcher) throws IOException { | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (topK.scoreDocs.length == 0) { | ||
| return MatchNoDocsQuery.INSTANCE; | ||
| return new MatchNoDocsQuery("No documents matched the nearest-neighbor search"); | ||
| } | ||
| return DocAndScoreQuery.createDocAndScoreQuery(reader, topK, reentryCount); | ||
| return DocAndScoreQuery.createDocAndScoreQuery( | ||
| reader, topK, reentryCount, noMatchExplainer(topK, filterWeight)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** Builds the explainer for documents this query did not collect, capturing minTopKScore. */ | ||
| private DocAndScoreQuery.NoMatchExplainer noMatchExplainer(TopDocs topK, Weight filterWeight) { | ||
| // topK is score-descending, so the lowest collected score is the last entry. | ||
| final float minTopKScore = topK.scoreDocs[topK.scoreDocs.length - 1].score; | ||
| return (context, doc, topN) -> | ||
| explainNotCollected(context, doc, topN, filterWeight, minTopKScore); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** Explains why a doc was not collected, by recomputing its score. null when no vectors. */ | ||
| private Explanation explainNotCollected( | ||
| LeafReaderContext context, int doc, int topN, Weight filterWeight, float minTopKScore) | ||
| throws IOException { | ||
| String prefix = "Not in top " + topN + " doc(s): "; | ||
| FieldInfo fi = context.reader().getFieldInfos().fieldInfo(field); | ||
| if (fi == null || fi.getVectorDimension() == 0) { | ||
| return null; | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. what happens when null is returned?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It would fall back to the generic |
||
| } | ||
| VectorScorer vectorScorer = createVectorScorer(context, fi); | ||
| if (vectorScorer == null) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
| if (vectorScorer.iterator().advance(doc) != doc) { | ||
| return Explanation.noMatch(prefix + "no vector value in field \"" + field + "\""); | ||
| } | ||
| if (filterWeight != null && docPassesFilter(filterWeight, context, doc) == false) { | ||
| return Explanation.noMatch(prefix + "excluded by filter"); | ||
| } | ||
| float score = vectorScorer.score(); | ||
| if (score < minTopKScore) { | ||
| return Explanation.noMatch( | ||
| prefix + "score " + score + " < minimum top-K score " + minTopKScore); | ||
| } | ||
| // Score meets the cutoff but the doc was not collected (tie-break, recall miss, or rescoring). | ||
| return Explanation.noMatch( | ||
| prefix | ||
| + "score " | ||
| + score | ||
| + " >= minimum top-K score " | ||
| + minTopKScore | ||
| + " (tie-break or approximate-search miss)"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private static boolean docPassesFilter(Weight filterWeight, LeafReaderContext context, int doc) | ||
| throws IOException { | ||
| Scorer scorer = filterWeight.scorer(context); | ||
| if (scorer == null) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| TwoPhaseIterator twoPhase = scorer.twoPhaseIterator(); | ||
| if (twoPhase != null) { | ||
| return twoPhase.approximation().advance(doc) == doc && twoPhase.matches(); | ||
| } | ||
| return scorer.iterator().advance(doc) == doc; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private TopDocs runSearchTasks( | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
filterWeight here was created during rewrite() against a specific reader. But explain() can be called later with a different reader. when that happens, filterWeight.scorer(context) gets a LeafReaderContext it wasn't built for, which could blow up.
match side is fine since scores/docs are already materialized in the array. but this no-match path re-evaluates the filter live, so it has this stale-reader risk.
can you add a try/catch around the filter check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, good catch!
Looking into this a bit, I don't think it would always throw an exception when called with a different reader, but it would evaluate the filter against the other reader's segment, giving the wrong answer.
Instead of the try/catch, I think we should gate the explain in DocAndScoreQuery#createWeight on contextIdentity, like so:
This is similar to the existing check in createWeight.
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added the guard as proposed above and confirmed that it works as intended.
Steps taken to confirmed it:
explain(Weight, int)withsearcherB.explain(weightA, 6);Without the guard, the IndexSearcher#explain(Weight, int) gives an incorrect explanation, with the check it gives the generic
Not in top X doc(s).message.